This situation will very likely cause many Timeshare Corporations to suffer a significant loss of income as many Owners decide to walk away, refuse to pay MFees and the Timeshare goes bankrupt shortly thereafter.
I'm not at all clear on what you mean by
Timeshare Corporations, but the deep pockets "big chains" will certainly be just fine.
Personally, I wonder and worry more about small, independent timeshare operations, where there are
no "deep corporate pockets" behind the scenes and where the owner population (at least in my own observation and experience) tends to be older. I know of (and own weeks at) several such places in Florida, each with just 20-40 total units. At one such property, the ownership (
not with
my vote) "opted out" of compliance with Florida's condo law which requires minimum financial reserves to be maintained. That a choice to "opt out" even exists at all is another conversation entirely, but that option does indeed exist and it is indeed sometimes exercised.
A vote to "opt out" of maintaining adequate financial reserves is (to me, anyhow) a relatively clear indication that a majority of folks there cannot or do not choose to look beyond the figure on their annual maintenance fee bill. With that much clear, what will those same folks do if / when their fees inevitably go up as a result of some unhappy owners having been "locked out" of their 2020 weeks (for which they already paid their fees) and bailing out? That would inevitably create higher maintenance fees for those still remaining; I can almost hear the sound of the dominoes falling there now. Even those remaining will have a pain threshold for fee increases. There is a point at which intelligent cost / benefit analysis leads to a reasonable conclusion of "No Mas" --- and folks just simply walking away. At some point, the future and viability of such a property as a timeshare facility will be in clear and obvious jeopardy,