• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 29 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered!
  • TUG started 30 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Check out our happy birthday post here: Happy Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Come check it out for a chance to win a Free TUG membership (or renewal) just for helping out!

    Read more here
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $21,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $21 Million dollars
  • Follow the TUG Member Banner as it travels the world on vacation with Timeshare owners! Also sign up to get the banner sent to you so you can submit a photo of your vacation with the banner to share with TUG! Banner Thread
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free! 60,000+ subscribers! Latest resort reviews and the most important topics discussed by owners during the week!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    Read more Here
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Where can I see the ROFR clause?

Maverick1963

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
367
Reaction score
126
Points
403
Location
Yokohama, Japan
Resorts Owned
HGVC Flamingo
I bought a Flamingo resale. So ROFR was not my issue. I saw a statement in a resale agent document meaning that purchase has nothing to do with ROFR. But usually where do you see the particular ROFR clause? If possible, would you tell me the exact wording HGVC is using? Millions of thanks in advance.
 

Talent312

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
17,143
Reaction score
6,912
Points
948
Resorts Owned
HGVC & GTS
It may be stated in other places in the "Declaration," but its in the original contract for my unit, as follows:

20. Developer Right of First Refusal before Resale. Before Purchaser may resell his Unit Week to a third party and for so long as the Developer holds Unit Weeks for sale at the Condominium, Purchaser is required to offer his Unit Week to Developer upon the same terms and conditions, including financing, as is offered by or to the third party. Accordingly, Purchaser must notify Developer in writing no less than 30 days in advance of the proposed closing date of his intent to sell and must include a copy of the proposed transaction reduced to writing in all respects. Upon receipt of such written notice, Develper shall determine prior to the proposed closing date whether it wishes to exercize its right of first refusal... Developer's right of first refusal is a covenant that runs with the land and shall always be a requirement binding on any successor in title to Purchaser.

[Phew].
 
Last edited:

Diane

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
512
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Albuquerque, NM
That last sentence sounds like ROFR is (or should have been) an issue on re-sale.

Diane
 

Maverick1963

TUG Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
367
Reaction score
126
Points
403
Location
Yokohama, Japan
Resorts Owned
HGVC Flamingo
Again, questions.

"Before Purchaser may resell his Unit Week to a third party and for so long as the Developer holds Unit Weeks for sale at the Condominium, Purchaser is required to offer his Unit Week to Developer upon the same terms and conditions, ..."

This reads that after HGVC has sold all of the inventory, Purchase (seller of unit for resale) does not have obligation to make the same offer to HGVC.

That means:

i) If contract for all other HGVC resorts has the same term, ROFR does not apply after HGVC clears units of inventory. There is possibility that even HHV does not have to go through ROFR check. Is this true? (I assume that sales will be a never ending story.)

ii) For Flamingo, which is true? Flamingo had the ROFR condition but HGVC sold all the units. As the result, the requirement just expired. Or there was no ROFR term for Flamingo from the beginning.

I just would like to have a correct piece of knowledge. If anyone could help me, I would be obliged.
 

Talent312

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
17,143
Reaction score
6,912
Points
948
Resorts Owned
HGVC & GTS
Its possilble that HGVC did not retain any Flamingo units for sale and thus, lost its ROFR; however, I rather suspect that Flamingo, being one of the first HGVC properties, did not have a ROFR clause in its contracts.

I'd guess that, with respect to its other properties, HGVC has been very careful about retaining its ROFR, either by retaining at least one unit for sale or by removing the provision which requires it to do so. Perhaps someone with a HHV unit can tell us which.
 

Talent312

Tug Review Crew: Rookie
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2007
Messages
17,143
Reaction score
6,912
Points
948
Resorts Owned
HGVC & GTS
That last sentence sounds like ROFR is (or should have been) an issue on re-sale.

Sorry. That clause was in a contract I have for Seaworld, not Flamingo...
So whether HGVC ever had a ROFR for Flamingo, I cannot say.
 
Top