Credits available, anniversary date are very important factors to ignore.As I showed two extreme examples, the difference is 4 years worth of credits which can be translate to 20-32 cents per credit. A number that average 45 with the variation of 20-32 is absolutely not acceptable. How useful is such data?
In actuality Larry, the anniversary date and credits available occasionally make little difference in final sale price on ebay. In fact..just this last week, there was a fully loaded 6k (12k available) account, that sold for less than a 6k (6k available) account, and a 6k, (0k available) account. One account sold for 4 cents per credit more than the loaded account, the other for 2 cents per credit more, and all were from reputable resellers. A couple of weeks before that (12-8) a fully loaded account sold for 50 cents per credit, followed by a non-loaded account that sold (12-13) for 61 cents per credit.
These aren't "hypothetical examples" but actually sales, and while such transactions are not frequent, they certainly aren't out of the ordinary.
In my book, a fully loaded account is worth more...but it is the bidding activity that drives the sale price on ebay, and the "spread" in sales prices, is often independent of whether an account has additional credits available or not. The question isn't whether a fully loaded account sells for more, or contains more value...but rather...how much more?
Of course...I'm actually tracking the data, where you are just making general assumptions, and therein lays our difference in perspective. While you ASSUME a 20-30 cent per credit difference, an
actual comparison of the sales figures shows less than a 5 cent difference on average.
In fact...when I take the last 10 fully loaded 6k (12k available) accounts dated from September to end of December, and compare them to 10 6k (6k available) accounts sold in September ...Ironically the non-loaded accounts actually average about 1 cent more (58 cents per credit and 59 cents per credit respectively)...but when you take into account how much the market has fallen since September, it is easy to see why there is a discrepancy, and obviously I made adjustments for that.
There is also a 5 cent difference in comparing loaded accounts that sold from September-December (higher credit values) to non-loaded accounts sold in December.(much lower credit values.). Similarly, when you take a fully loaded account...and average the price of the non-loaded accounts with the same credit value, sold on the same day, or within the same week, you will see roughly, a 5 cent difference. Sure..sometimes a fully loaded account will sell for 20 cents more than a non-loaded accounts..but other times, those non-loaded accounts sell for more than the loaded ones...or the price is really close.
Tracking an average just gives that...an average. But in addition to offering an average...I also offer all the Raw data I have collected (to those that wish to email me and request the information), so that you can make those comparisons yourself. Many, have already taken me up on that offer.
Frankly, I think you are assuming much more of a price variation, based upon actual credits available, and anniversary date, then there actually is, and I have the data to prove it.