A few relevant (?) observations....
I did check up on the closing company (eMidsouth) and every one on this board had good things to say about them. So I'm in the process of finding out what actually an "interval conveyance" is. But they did offer title insurance, which I doubt would be available with a quit claim deed. I'm willing to take a warranty deed or title insurance, but a quit claim would be a no go.
1. eMidSouth is actually a reseller, not a closing company (although, as recently mentioned, Bryan Watson (principal in eMidSouth)
may have recently established his own internal "closing company", for all I know.
2. I just found a 1996 deed in my files for a developer-direct purchase in Broward County, FL which was entitled "Deed of Interval Conveyance". Definitely not just a quit claim deed, but it's also not at all clear to me why that initial purchase wasn't a "warranty deed" (as the next deed certainly was, without any problem at all, when that ownership was sold about 10 years later). The language seems (to me, anyhow) indistinguishable from that which would have been found in a warranty deed, but I'm no expert.
In any event, you're correct that title insurance wouldn't be available with a quit claim deed, but I'm at a loss to explain the "conveyance" language. Legal expertise and input seems required here and I'd bet on getting a clear and definitive (...and correct) explanation from
Carolinian at some point.
Do you even have the option here of using an independent closing company which is not the seller just putting on a different hat to "seal the deal"?
As mentioned already, I am not a fan of having foxes handle administrative details within the henhouse. There just seems to me to be a potential (and unsettling) lack of objectivity or detachment in such arrangements, when the seller and his/her closing entity are essentially one and the same....