The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 29 years!
Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered!
TUG started 29 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!
TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $20,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!
Our 2022 Timeshare Survey is now complete and the full results as well as our expert and witty analysis of each question is available here: Here We hope you enjoy reading the results as much as we did!
Follow the TUG Member Banner as it travels the world on vacation with Timeshare owners! Also sign up to get the banner sent to you so you can submit a photo of your vacation with the banner to share with TUG! Banner Thread
Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free! 50,000+ subscribers! Latest resort reviews and the most important topics discussed by owners during the week!
Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!
To me it is nothing more than a pricing scheme. I bet that soon, Starwood will raise the ski prices up close to $55-60K, and then they will drop that Silver purchase requirement.
This will help Starwood by allowing it to sell nearly worthless silver season weeks for a substantial price; it is a stealth revenue enhancer.
This could separately benefit the HOA by insuring that those mud season weeks generate MF revenue.
I wonder whether the "tied-in" purchase of the mud season week is on the same deed as the ski week and whether the silver week can later be sold separately. If the CC&R's or other governing documents permit the silver week to later be sold separately, then some of those silver weeks will end up in the hands of non-paying owners and the HOA will not get the anticipated benefit. It will also create two tiers of ski weeks -- those that must pay double MF's and those that do not. Double MF's = $4,000+ per year, an expensive ski vacation (especially for weeks 48-50). This creates an incentive to dump the silver week at any price and to sell the ski week separately; the project documentation should cover this, but who knows.
I note that there are other ski area TS's with multiple week arrangements. This may make economic sense (a ski week has a higher use value than a summer week, so it should bear more of the MF's), but it requires more analysis of the plan documentation and in determining the correct price to pay.
I am sure the weeks are deeded separately, as the rep was checking to see if a platinum (summer) week could be substituted for the fall silver (spring/fall) week. The price difference is $6K more for the platinum week, but it offers more than double the Star Options.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.