The people who have enough money to set it on fire by knowingly buying from the developer (in most cases) are not the people who are knowingly buying from the developer (in most cases). At least, that’s the impression I get. I’m excluding the rare edge cases where buying from the developer can maybe make sense with some very narrow strategies used in certain systems, although I think the days where buying from a developer could still make financial sense are largely behind us given how much developer prices have outpaced inflation over the last 40 years.
I think it depends on the people and the resort. Most of the people that are buying a higher priced timeshare do so because they want it and see value in it even at the high price. They don't have to think about if they can afford it because they can, imo. Most people buying developer products costing less can probably afford that too. Both of these types of sales are to people that see value in the product and know how much they can afford to pay, imo. Many in this group has enough cash to purchase without financing. This group probably represents about 25% of buyers.
The next group would be those that see value and buy but need financing. They buy nice timeshares from the developer because it seems to make sense and they can afford the costs.
The next group would be those that should not be buying a luxury item like a timeshare but they do and end up having problems keeping up with the costs.
No offence, but Tuggers are considered bottom feeders to developer sales staff. We buy, often for nothing, what others don't want and figure out how to get every dimes use out of the products because of the Tug community sharing tips.
From what I can tell most people feel that if the deal is too good it's a scam. A free timeshare does seem scammy to those that don't know what Tuggers know. That may be the biggest reason people are afraid of resales.
Bill