Janette
TUG Member
Disney just declined the RFR on our Boadwalk purchase in one week. It was a pretty good contract with banked points and our same use month.
Availability of DVC time in II is noticeably increased lately. Disney is acknowledging that the older resorts can no longer be sold for full price as the time left is so different than new. You will now start to see ROFR numbers dropping or dropped all together as DVC knows it can't resell the short timers for all that much.
If you are a long term lease holder - RTU buyer this may be the very short period that will serve as your warning that the bottom is about to drop out of the illusion of price controlled resales and ROFR. If you think you are going to sell in the next year or two better do it before the market alone sets the rate. It won't be anything close to $70 per point. In fact DVC "old points" may become a bargain similar to Wyndham and others. The combination of limited remaining use years, sky high fees and DVC stopping ROFR (although that only punishes buyers - it won't help you sellers one bit) means the resale value will plummet. Buyers will still buy but only at a bargain price.
What are you smoking?
Perhaps we need to make an online bet about the future of DVC and see who is more accurate in the future....any ideas?
Bill - I started predicting the drop around 2004 within 5 years. Now it's 2008 and we're starting to see the cracks. Another couple years and the "old" points are going to be at market price as Disney knows where the value is for them.
It passed ROFR because Disney has considerably sped up the process lately (not because it was a bad deal).
We are thrilled as we just don't have the time to keep taking these 1 week vacations (and paying the weekend air-fare)!
Congratulations on your contract!Disney just declined the RFR on our Boadwalk purchase in one week. It was a pretty good contract with banked points and our same use month.
John, why do you come to these boards? You obviously just like to spew negativity without one thing to back up your arguement.Availability of DVC time in II is noticeably increased lately. Disney is acknowledging that the older resorts can no longer be sold for full price as the time left is so different than new. You will now start to see ROFR numbers dropping or dropped all together as DVC knows it can't resell the short timers for all that much. The value to them will be in the annual fees until they get it back when the RTU ends - for free! Why pay for it?
So if you are thinking about DVC points you may want to start shopping around and offering lower prices for the "old" points. You may be very pleasantly surprised at the results if purchase cost is important to you. Of course once you buy you're saddled with those fees but you already knew that. The resorts should stay well maintained as Disney gets to charge the big fees right until the last use year. They want them back in perfect shape!
If you are a long term lease holder - RTU buyer this may be the very short period that will serve as your warning that the bottom is about to drop out of the illusion of price controlled resales and ROFR. If you think you are going to sell in the next year or two better do it before the market alone sets the rate. It won't be anything close to $70 per point. In fact DVC "old points" may become a bargain similar to Wyndham and others. The combination of limited remaining use years, sky high fees and DVC stopping ROFR (although that only punishes buyers - it won't help you sellers one bit) means the resale value will plummet. Buyers will still buy but only at a bargain price.
Let the fun begin!
Congrats on your contract!! We are waiting ROFR also - we are at the one week mark.Disney just declined the RFR on our Boadwalk purchase in one week. It was a pretty good contract with banked points and our same use month.
John, why do you come to these boards? You obviously just like to spew negativity without one thing to back up your arguement.
I do like a variety of opinions, but I don't think it's right if you're coming just to bash DVC at every turn.
Isn't there a name for that??..
I like many of his posts, but he also has a ax to grind with Westgate and my be 100% justified in his disdain for that company. I feel like a lone ranger trying to defend Westgate, but my experience is only limited to Park City as I have no desire to own or visit any of their other resorts.
His overblown criticism of DVC and the RTU is a mystery to me as Disney is THE ONLY timeshare company that the average mom and pop can buy and not lose their shirt when the ink dries on the contract.
With Marriott Orlando, you immediately lose about 40-50% of your money the second you seal the deal on the contract if you buy directly from Marriott.
With Disney you only lose about 10-15% or so as the resales prices are so high. If you keep a DVC contract for more than 3 years, you are into the break-even category if you ever sell.
Au contraire, mon frere.John, why do you come to these boards? You obviously just like to spew negativity without one thing to back up your arguement.
I think if Disney ever unlocked the mouse gates and truly built or aquired a decent amount of T/S locations outside the parks they could blow the doors open on the T/S industry.
I must respectfully disagree. The only thing DVC has to offer is the parks. The couple places they have gone without being within one of their park properties they have not "blown the doors off" but have been rather run of the mill at a much higher price. They seem to know where their strength is and that the market is limited. They do a great job of serving that. As a general timeshare company, something I doubt they'd even want to be, they would be below many others that do it as their focus.
Au contraire, mon frere.
timeos2 doesn't need anybody to stick up for him or go to bat on his behalf. (But I'm not letting that stop me.) His the voice of experience -- good & bad experience, positive and negative -- which he willingly passes along to his TUG-BBS friends & acquaintances so they won't have to learn everything the hard way. That's not "spewing negativity." That's sharing real-world experiences.
Sure, he can be semi-tough in relating his WestGate story, but it's all based on actual experiences he's gone through with WestGate. "Nothing to back up your argument?" Hardly. The opposite is true.
Those who have ears, let them hear.
-- Alan Cole, McLean (Fairfax County), Virginia, USA.
I must respectfully disagree. The only thing DVC has to offer is the parks. The couple places they have gone without being within one of their park properties they have not "blown the doors off" but have been rather run of the mill at a much higher price. They seem to know where their strength is and that the market is limited. They do a great job of serving that. As a general timeshare company, something I doubt they'd even want to be, they would be below many others that do it as their focus.
Persuading new buyers that Disney Vacation Club is about more than visiting Disney's theme parks.
Sybil Woolfork, Disney Vacation Club's director of marketing, said the television commercial aims to remove one of the "key barriers" keeping potential time-share buyers from considering Disney's program.
"It really does help to dispel the myth that Disney Vacation Club is only Disney," Woolfork said.