I don't understand the logic of complaining that a party to a contract exercised a right under that contract.
-- The logic is that today I received a call from Stan Soroka, HGV Executive VP and Chief Customer Officer, in response to my email to HGV. He was the author of the August 21 message that informed us of the conversion rate change.
-- He was very personable. We had a great conversation. He explained in much greater detail the corporate thinking behind all the changes affecting owners. I understood the difficult decisions and careful planning that went into every decision and now realize this conversion change, for one year, was right--when looking at the big picture and when looking at everything that was done, in perspective. There was nothing sinister--just a corporation doing what they could to respond to a global pandemic while also protecting and responding to owner concerns.
-- All I ever sought was a little more understanding as to the thinking behind this decision to change the conversion ratio. My mistake was going to this group instead of to the corporation that made the decision. Always better to get information first hand.
-- The bottom line is that HGV felt saving points for free and then doubling up those points with next year's points would make more owners happy, although costing HGV more money, than cutting the conversion rate. Owners could then go to better places with double the points available. From the majority of the discussions in the group, it sounds like they made the right decision.
-- I'm happy because Stan called in response to my email with logical explanations. Everyone else is happy because they got to save points for free.