- Joined
- Jun 12, 2005
- Messages
- 1,114
- Reaction score
- 334
- Location
- Point Richmond
- Resorts Owned
- Red Wolf Lakeside Lodge, Hanalei Bay Resort, Sweetbriar Lake tahoe, Marriott Canyon Villas, Hyatt High Sierra, Point at Poipu
The downside of severe storms
They may have died doing what they loved, but what is even more sad is that the tragedy was completely avoidable.I am deeply saddened by the deaths of eight skiers caught in an avalanche. I skied and snowmobiled for well over half my life, and was accepted to ski patrol in Germany. May they rest in peace and their families find a way to understand that they died doing what they loved.
So was doing what they loved.They may have died doing what they loved, but what is even more sad is that the tragedy was completely avoidable.
Kurt
People also ski in this area all of the time. They choose to, knowing the risks. They had set out before the avalanche warnings, on a multi-day trip. All of the details of their tragedy are not known (were they returning, trying to get back the safest way they knew, etc, etc.)These deaths due to this avalanche are tragic, but there was a lot of bad decision making involved:
- This major storm was expected, and there have been lots of warnings for days, including avalanche warnings.
- This area is known for avalanches.
- Last month, a snowmobiler died from an avalanche in the same area.
- This trip was guided by 4 professional guides - who should have known better.
They may have died doing what they loved, but what is even more sad is that the tragedy was completely avoidable.
Kurt
They could have still done what they loved and the tragedy could still have been avoided.So was doing what they loved.
They may have died doing what they loved, but what is even more sad is that the tragedy was completely avoidable.
Kurt
So was doing what they loved.
That's what I said. They could have avoided doing what they loved, but chose not to.And still avoidable.
You replied while I was still editing. Please read my edited post. They didn't have to avoid doing what they loved to avoid this tragedy -- it's not an either/or situation. They could have still done what they loved at a different time, a different place, a different way, etc.That's what I said. They could have avoided doing what they loved, but chose not to.
Maybe, maybe not. Lots of these adventure seekers love living on the edge, love going out during or after the biggest dump despite the risks, etc. Or maybe heading back after the huge snowfall was part and parcel of their adventure, that they evaluated and decided was unavoidable to do what they loved. It is not known how the group (or individuals) perceived the risks, how they evaluated it, and what their choices were, other than to leave camp and head home. We simply don't know yet, and may never know as to some of them.You replied while I was still editing. Please read my edited post. They didn't have to avoid doing what they loved to avoid this tragedy -- it's not an either/or situation. They could have still done what they loved at a different time, a different place, a different way, etc.
There certainly are different ways of going backcountry skiing that are far less risky than what they did; I wasn't implying that they needed to backtrack all the way to taking lifts and skiing groomed runs.Maybe, maybe not. Lots of these adventure seekers love living on the edge, love going out during or after the biggest dump despite the risks, etc. Or maybe heading back after the huge snowfall was part and parcel of their adventure, that they evaluated and decided was unavoidable to do what they loved. It is not known how the group (or individuals) perceived the risks, how they evaluated it, and what their choices were, other than to leave camp and head home. We simply don't know yet, and may never know as to some of them.
For some (this group and people at large), maybe they sought more than going up a chairlift and down a groomed run in a ski area. Maybe doing it a different way, or place, or time was not for them. Like people that climb Yosemite's walls without ropes. We can sit in our armchairs and say they could avoided death by using ropes, but we don't get to define their passion for things that they love to do.
You have completely altered reality as you often do. What people say is "they died doing what they loved," which most likely is true here. No one who is not suicidal or for medical reasons wants to die doing anything. But many people accept that they could die doing lots of things they love to do. That is what the phrase means. It does not mean they didn't experience pain, nor does it take away from the fact that they died at all.I've heard "doing what they loved" too many times. No one loves to die while participating in an activity they enjoy. It's never helped a person that lost a love one, imo. It's such a cliche saying usually used to marginalize death, imo. The skiers that died in the avalanche had a slow death and were probably fully aware of their situation, which is a terrible way to go.
Sorry if this came off a bit morbid. It isn't meant to be.
Bill
You have completely altered reality as you often do. What people say is "they died doing what they loved," which most likely is true here. No one who is not suicidal or for medical reasons wants to die doing anything. But many people accept that they could die doing lots of things they love to do. That is what the phrase means. It does not mean they didn't experience pain, nor does it take away from the fact that they died at all.
No one says "They loved to die..." That is absurd, false, and disparaging. Everything else you say is irrelevant and speculation as well. Bill, serious question: Did you not do well in school?