Im a nerd but your thoughts here are so interesting to me. I’ve been a private wealth advisor for past 15 years. I’ve worked with lots of attorneys especially in the estate planning area.Thank you. I'm not sure it's a great idea but I think it could be worth exploring. I'm an attorney but I focus on estate planning and criminal defense. (I know that's a weird mix)
I was playing with some language, I wonder if something like this would work:
"Seller shall submit a list of desired resorts and dates for the 2021 and 2022 usage years on or before May 1 of said year. Using reasonable effort, Buyer will attempt to book those resorts and dates (in order of Seller’s preference) on Seller’s behalf.
Buyer makes no warranty regarding availability of Seller’s desired units. If Buyer is unable to make a booking on Seller’s behalf but has exercised reasonable efforts to do so, Seller will still be responsible for the $x fee for that year.
If Seller fails to provide a preference list by May 1st, Buyer will still make a reasonable attempt to accommodate Seller, but the $x annual payment will still be due."
Maybe "shenanigans" is fair here, but there's no sort of avoidance of dues involved.
There's actually a precedent for this type of agreement with ROFR options in the NFL (that was the inspiration for this). Back in the mid-2000's, the Viking and Seahawks went back-and-forth.
The first was a guard on the Seahawks who they tagged with what is essentially a ROFR. The Vikings offered him a contract for $49 million, and had a clause that would immediately guarantee the entire amount if he was ever not the highest paid lineman on the team. Since the Seahawks already had a lineman making more money, matching the offer would have made it fully guaranteed, which wasn't palatable for them.
The next year, the Seahawks lured a Viking by offering to fully guarantee a contract if he ever had to play 5 games in Minnesota in a single season. Since the Seahawks would play a max of 2, and the Vikings would play a minimum of 8, you can see where that went.
As I'm thinking about it, I wonder if something more targeted at BG could work (I'm kind of having fun with this). Maybe a Buyer's promise not to resell the within 10 years, with the penalty being defined as an immediate forfeiture of 50% of Buyer's existing timeshare deeds with a 10 year prepayment of maintenance fees.
I think you could craft this yourself and find a good seller; it would totally work. I think the biggest problem would have been getting the right attorney to draft it at a cost that wasn’t above the benefit. You’ve got that part taken care of. Seeing the number of people out there trying to sell these I’m sure you can find your seller.