The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!
Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!
TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $23,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!
Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!
Because I am primarily a Vistana owner and was under different ROFR policies, I wonder if MVC ROFR team is active all year long? Does MVC aggressively review every deal? Curious. TIA
MVC ROFR always seems somewhat random and unpredictable. All deals must be submitted for review and then they decide to either waive or exercise.
Based on comments made by executive management in their investor presentations, it seems they have a target that roughly 33% of their inventory investment should be repurchases, and 67% new development, and they want 1.5 to 2 years of inventory on hand at any given time to support sales. My suspicion is the variability we see in ROFR may be related to week-to-week or month-to-month adjustments they need to make to hit those targets. In other words, if within a given time period they get a lot of deals presented that are attractive for them to exercise ROFR, and their inventory builds a bit, maybe they might slow down on ROFR and let some deals go through that they might have ordinarily exercised, so as not to accumulate too much inventory on their books. New development has a long lead time but a more predictable run rate of new inventory coming into the Trust, whereas they can turn the ROFR spigot on or off (maybe more accurate to say fast or slow) as needed to maintain their desired inventory mix and levels.
MVC ROFR always seems somewhat random and unpredictable. All deals must be submitted for review and then they decide to either waive or exercise.
Based on comments made by executive management in their investor presentations, it seems they have a target that roughly 33% of their inventory investment should be repurchases, and 67% new development, and they want 1.5 to 2 years of inventory on hand at any given time to support sales. My suspicion is the variability we see in ROFR may be related to week-to-week or month-to-month adjustments they need to make to hit those targets. In other words, if within a given time period they get a lot of deals presented that are attractive for them to exercise ROFR, and their inventory builds a bit, maybe they might slow down on ROFR and let some deals go through that they might have ordinarily exercised, so as not to accumulate too much inventory on their books. New development has a long lead time but a more predictable run rate of new inventory coming into the Trust, whereas they can turn the ROFR spigot on or off (maybe more accurate to say fast or slow) as needed to maintain their desired inventory mix and levels.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.