Hello,
I appreciate and thank you for your feedback.
While there is no doubt that the issues I shared can be overcome, it comes down to efficiency, serviceability and what we can manage in scale.
Simply put, we would be depending on several variables that we cannot control to keep good tabs on the third party transaction. We would be dependent on the renting party for notification of the rental and the re-issue of the confirmation paperwork (By the way, we do not have a systematic way to get that new confirmation to the third party). We would also be dependant on the renting party for their agreement to the renter, assuming the rental agreement is written correctly.
These processes simply don't scale well and unfortunately leave us in the middle of the rental transaction without having driven it.
Remember, we do not charge for upgrading units (deposit a one bedroom, get a two bedroom). We are also very straight forward about the fact that we do not offer our inventory for rent to the general marketplace (non-timeshare owners). With that, we have tried to stay consistent in policy by not supporting a transaction that has us taking a low value week in deposit (say a one bedroom in low season), for a week of more value (without paying an upgrade fee) and renting it out to the general public for an upgraded charge.
The way our guest certificates work, we issue a guest certificate upon request from the exchanging member at no charge, but the member is still the responsible party for the unit condition at the end of the stay.
We love the feedback, keep it coming. Good, new ideas and debate are what keeps us on our toes and flexible to the needs of the marketplace! It's why we're here on TUG.
Thanks again