DrQ
TUG Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
- Messages
- 5,873
- Reaction score
- 3,837
- Points
- 648
- Location
- DFW
- Resorts Owned
- HICV, Westgate (second cousin, twice removed)
A few things:Heard an interesting conversation on the radio. One that raises questions about this "study". Why was this aspect was not in the study? The corn growers associsation claim is that the corn they plant removes carbon from the air (know to be true), they now produce more corn per acre with the same input, and the ethanol produced from corn used as a fuel reduces emmissions, and that this gives them a better/comparable carbon foot print than electric vehicles.
- I don't think the entire process of producing ethanol is carbon neutral
Although biofuels are in theory carbon neutral, this does not take into account the carbon dioxide emissions associated with growing, harvesting and transporting the crops, or producing the ethanol from them. Therefore, overall, more carbon dioxide is emitted than is absorbed, which means that it contributes to global warming.
- Ethanol has fewer BTUs than gasoline when burned
- Ethanol makes up only 10% of the fuel mixture (Corn growers Assn is pushing for 15%, but car manufacturers are pushing back saying it will void your warranty)
- The growing of corn for ethanol has contributed to a huge "dead" zone in the Gulf of Mexico
There's a 'dead zone' in the Gulf of Mexico this summer that's bigger than Connecticut
A region of oxygen-depleted water off the Louisiana and Texas coasts that's harmful to sea life is larger than average this summer.
www.usatoday.com
Last edited: