Kidpolska
TUG Member
When comparing MF's for the different resorts, it seems like the Hawaiian resorts have some of the lowest fees around. Anyone know why this is so? Do they tend to have more special assessments than other properties?
When comparing MF's for the different resorts, it seems like the Hawaiian resorts have some of the lowest fees around. Anyone know why this is so? Do they tend to have more special assessments than other properties?
I would revise this to say: SOME of the Wyndham Hawaiian resorts have low maintenance fees. Others do not. For example, Ka'eo Kai Maintenance Fees are rather high, Kaui Beach Villas are average-ish. Bali Hai and Shearwater are very low.
In the case of Shearwater, and to a lesser extent Bali Hai, the reason is at least in part because it costs so many points to stay there. Here's the math behind it (greatly simplified but you can easily extrapolate to a full resort):
Resort A has a 2BR Deluxe unit that costs 154,000 points to stay in for a week. Let's call it... Fairfield Glade as an example. Weeks at The Glade have maintenance fees in the $740/year range, plus CWP when converted.
Resort B has a 2BR Deluxe unit that costs 325,000 points to stay in for a week. Let's call it... a Bali Hai Penthouse 2BR unit. The Bali Hai maintenance fee per week is about $1015/year range, plus CWP when converted.
The Bali Hai maintenance fee is actually higher than Fairfield Glade for a 2BR. But the resultant MF$/K point is much lower because the week at Bali Hai is worth more than twice as many points as the week at Glade.
But points are points right? So if I bought at Bali Hai and I never went there I could use the points at other Wyndham resorts and my maintenance fees would be lower than if I bought at the resorts I was going to stay at. Using your example above I could stay 2 weeks at Fairfield Glade for $1015/ year if I owned at Bali Hai instead of the $1480/year it would cost if I owned at Glade and I would had ARP at Bali Hail if I ever did want to stay there.
Points are points except the ARP aspect, which you noted. Also, the front end cost of a Bali Hai contract, if you can find one, is going to be significantly higher than a Glade contract.
I agree that the initial cost is more but you could stay twice as much with at Glade and save $450/year with Bali Hai contract. I would also think the Bali Hai contract would be easier to sell latter. I think the initial cost would be about $4000 more with closing cost giving you about a 9 year break even point but you would also have twice as many weeks at Glade.
So if you are going to do this is CWA less expensive than say a Bali Hai contract?
When comparing MF's for the different resorts, it seems like the Hawaiian resorts have some of the lowest fees around. Anyone know why this is so? Do they tend to have more special assessments than other properties?
Maintenance fees? CWA is significantly higher than Bali Hai. Purchase price? CWA was going nuts ($16-$20/K) for a couple weeks in the summer, but I cannot imagine that on the average, you can find a Bali Hai contract for the same price per point as a CWA. Also note that if ARP IS an issue for you and you want to stay in HI frequently, CWA has no deeds in HI at all.