Jim, maybe it is different in Europe but I have just checked the HOPA for our Playa Andaluza RTU ownership and if I read the "legalese" correctly then at the end of termRTU, right to use, means exactly what it says. In 2056 Aruba might grant another lease period to MVC. If they do MVC has no obligation to the current owners. They could sell the units all over again if they desired. Or they could let the current owners continue and just keep paying MFs. Or they might not get the lease renewed.
Any speculation after 2056 is just that, speculation.
I will be 106 so I'll let my children worry about it then.
Is there any history of a RTU timeshare property expiring? If so, what happened?
Is there any history of a RTU timeshare property expiring? If so, what happened?
I had a RTU timeshare that expired in 2011. When I originally bought, they told me I could by another contract when that one expired at the same price. We opted not to and gave it back to the resort.
I wasn't really looking at this as good or bad Jim, just sharing information.If you want to assume these are good scenario's that's a positive way of looking at it,
- after discharging any liabilities and management charges, the net proceeds of sale are distributed to existing holiday owners in good standing
o
Under this solution you are assuming that after liabilities and management charges there will be money left over to divide among the owners. What if there is a net loss?
- the plan is renewed along with the RTU ownership for existing holiday owners in good standing
Under this solution it could be very costly to remain an owner. If the lease is renewed at an increased lease fee then the current owners would have to absorb that in increased MFs. It's possible that the lease could be renewed with the same terms but I would think that a highly unlikely scenario.