schreff
TUG Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
- Messages
- 207
- Reaction score
- 57
- Points
- 88
- Resorts Owned
- KBV, Bali Hai, Wyndham Palm Aire, Bonnet Creek, Patriot's Place, Harbour, Sea Watch, etc.
Supporters and lovers of Wyndham are many. This is fact but this hurts no one. However, Wyndham's abuses from sales and underhanded techniques and new polices which lower the benefits of those who have significant investments in their timeshares are many. This is fact too but hurts timeshare owners and TUGGERS. Most of these abuses have been elaborated on here and are cited all over the internet. Those deniers are either ignorant, heartless or naive. As stated, I loved my Fairfield/Wyndham for 40 years but 10 years ago my wife and I have experienced an erosion in VIP benefits and quality of many Wyndham Resorts.
I have posted that I feel that a good TUG policy would be to have posting TUGGERS disclaim any past or present conflict of interest in Wyndham or other timeshare company so that no bias or misleading posts could occur without blatant misrepresentations. What and who would this hurt? No one except those who have gained by using false information in the past. Wyndham employees, paid baby lobbyist, spouses of those, or any others who gain or have gained directly or indirectly should fully disclose this so that TUGGERS are not misled by their words. These folks are here and everywhere including social media so beware. This is not a conspiracy theory and intelligent folks know it.
Those who attack folks who believe that fair means the unbiased truth should answer the simple question, " What and who would it hurt to fully disclose if you have any conflicts of interest in any post you make as a TUGGER " . This is not only a Wyndham problem it is a problem with many topics we participate in as TUGGERS.
I have posted that I feel that a good TUG policy would be to have posting TUGGERS disclaim any past or present conflict of interest in Wyndham or other timeshare company so that no bias or misleading posts could occur without blatant misrepresentations. What and who would this hurt? No one except those who have gained by using false information in the past. Wyndham employees, paid baby lobbyist, spouses of those, or any others who gain or have gained directly or indirectly should fully disclose this so that TUGGERS are not misled by their words. These folks are here and everywhere including social media so beware. This is not a conspiracy theory and intelligent folks know it.
Those who attack folks who believe that fair means the unbiased truth should answer the simple question, " What and who would it hurt to fully disclose if you have any conflicts of interest in any post you make as a TUGGER " . This is not only a Wyndham problem it is a problem with many topics we participate in as TUGGERS.
Last edited: