But you are indirectly scolding someone for going out to purchase chocolates when they can be ordered online.
After so many months, I’m no longer hoping people do the right thing and instead doing what little I can to influence their decisions. If there is a safer way to accomplish a goal, why wouldn’t you take it?
You are participating in Black Friday deals.
I have not been inside any retail store since early March. I have not eaten at any restaurant, inside or out, since March 9. The only buildings I have been to have been for medical appointments, and even then I don’t take elevators (with one notable exception when the stairway door was locked). The only place I have personally bought anything is at a local outdoor farm.
All Black Friday and other purchases I make are online.
What about the people that have to deliver those chocolates?
The best way I know to limit the spread is to reduce the number of people that congregate in any location. Delivery company employees tend not to be inside (at least, not when delivering) and I believe work alone so they should be much safer than, for example, working in an office.
Or those that have to manufacturer these things? Why is it ok to put THEM in harm's way? All of the people involved in the procurement of these products could be asymptotic and spreading Covid. How is THAT ok?
It’s not okay. I have never advocated shutting the country down. I have advocated being as safe as possible. Ordering online and having everything possible delivered is what I can do to limit the spread, and as it’s not that hard to do I encourage others to do the same. The manufacturers that seem to have uncontrolled infections are those that require employees to be indoors in close proximity to others for long periods of time, such as those meat packing companies we read about months ago. However, I haven’t read the same in recent months so I’m hoping that means they have found ways to increase separation, air flow, etc, but I’m not sure.
Thanks for asking.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk