FDA Commissioner - Misinformation is now our leading cause of death.

[easyrider]

Do you know where the money goes in a nonprofit?

I'm not saying the FLCCC doctors or those that agree with them are non-profit. I'm saying that the FLCCC is a non-profit. The FLCCC has been totally transparent and anyone can view their protocols and discuss this with their doctor or a FLCCC doctor.

Bill

 

["Roger"]

... Most studies that refute Ivermectin efficacy is affiliated with a pharmaceutical company which is a conflict of interest, imo.

Bill

I am not going to take the time to go through them all, but here is a copy of the disclosure form for the Brazilian study.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869/suppl_file/nejmoa2115869_disclosures.pdf

Notice that "No" is consistently checked for potential conflict of interest. That includes the question about relevant financial interest.

 

[emeryjre]

Yes, I am. I trust not for profit doctors that cure people more than I do for profit politicians and bureaucrats that have never cured anyone. Most studies that refute Ivermectin efficacy is affiliated with a pharmaceutical company which is a conflict of interest, imo.

Bill

Glad I got that correct.

 

[easyrider]

I am not going to take the time to go through them all, but here is a copy of the disclosure form for the Brazilian study.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869/suppl_file/nejmoa2115869_disclosures.pdf

Notice that "No" is consistently checked for potential conflict of interest. That includes the question about relevant financial interest.

If you don't consider researchers and studies funded by grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, McMaster University, Rain Water Charitable Foundation, Unitaid and others of a similar bias a conflict of interest what is. Even though a person can claim they have no conflict of interest regarding research because they have accepted no funds personally the research is still funded by foundations with a vaccine bias.

Bill

 

["Roger"]

The Brazilian study was funded by the Fastgrants and Rainwater Foundation. i am baffled by how you have came to the conclusion that this family foundation has a predetermined axe to grind.

 

["Roger"]

I posted the above from my phone just as I was headed to bed and had no ability to copy links. Here is a link to the Rainwater Foundation. I see nothing there that would indicate that they would be interested in unfairly undermining ivermectin with purposely misleading research. Furthermore, the Foundation itself does not do the research. That means that they would have had to find a complicit doctor with enough expertise to run a study and was willing to falsely sign a conflict of interest statement.

I will add that every rct that I have seen that found ivermectin to be ineffective had the author sign a non-conflict of interest statement.

 

[easyrider]

The Brazilian study was funded by the Fastgrants and Rainwater Foundation. i am baffled by how you have came to the conclusion that this family foundation has a predetermined axe to grind.

I didn't say anyone has anything other than a vaccine bias. The Brazilian study was funded by Together Clinical Trials which is sponsored by McMaster University and Pontifical Catholic University which received most of their funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Other listed partners like Cytel and University of Ottawa also received funding from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Fast Grants distributes funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Rain Water Charitable Foundation has funded many medical type studies. All of these groups support a group called "The Together Trial".

These groups have plenty of money and are pro-vaccine and there isn't anything really wrong with that until they get it even slightly wrong which they have regarding doctors and patients using legal products to fight covid and mRNA vaccines, imo.

Bill