Yes, that way the e-trucks and cars can be used practically to keep driving non stop on long vacation trips and allow truckers to keep moving efficiently during their allowed drive times.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but a one mile test strip is at best preliminary. The amount of power that would need to be transferred would be HUGE. If the amount of power contained in a Ford F-150's basic 230 mile range battery will (Ford claims) run a typical house's electrical needs for 3 days on a 40 minute charge, my mind can't comprehend the amount of electrons and how it would be billed while thousands of vehicles drive over this induction charging highway.I think this is what you would like to happen:
ElectReon, the Israeli startup that provides wireless and in-road electric vehicle (EV) charging technology, is set to deploy its first public wireless EV charging road system in the US. The electric road startup will establish wireless charging tech in Detroit, Michigan.
The electrified road will stretch up to a mile long and will be located near Detroit’s Michigan Central Terminal, an abandoned train station that Ford is converting into a mobility innovation district. The state of Michigan plans to contribute $1.9 million to the project which ElectReon said will be fully functional by 2023.
The company’s goal is to allow EVs to carry smaller batteries, or maybe none at all, making them lighter and more efficient, as well as reducing the environmental costs of battery production.
Couldn't someone have just downloaded a different search engine/browser?The EU also requires that smart phones, like Android, offer other search engine options besides Google. When I was working in Europe, I had DuckDuckGo as my search engine. I asked the local computer repair shop about replacing Google on the US Android and was told you cannot. Choice is good and the EU provided that on search engines.
I think it was actually the late 90s and into the 2000s. Was IE even developed in the 80s? The internet wasn't even mainstream yet.Microsoft was sued by Netscape navigator about this same bundling their internet explorer browser back in the 1980's
Thank slip, that sounds right.Internet Explorer first came out with Windows 95.
Slip, do you have cable modems there in Molokai?Thank slip, that sounds right.
Slip, do you have cable modems there in Molokai?
There is no license fee per USB-C connector to pay to the USB-IF organisation. There is a fee to get a USB Vendor ID and to use the USB logo on your products but the fee is waived for USB-IF organisation members where Apple is a major member of this organisation.Certainly if this law was enacted when Micro USB was the big thing, we would have seen slow progression to USB-C. I hate micro USB. I really do like USB-C and it does seem to be the future, but it has drawbacks. Licensing is more expensive than Micro USB. Why should Apple be forced to pay licensing when it has its own proprietary connector which it doesn't have to pay any licensing to use in its products? I am sure Apple also makes significant revenue from licensing out its Lighting protocol to third party accessory manufacturers.
The tech can probably get better, but we will forever have the USB-C connector. They can increase transmission rate, to a limit, with the existing connector.Um, what happens when the USB-C is obsolete? USB tech changes every 5-7 years. This will simply stifle innovation.
I'm sure they said the same thing about the mini-usb and micro-usb. The point is no one can accurately predict where tech will be in 5 years.The tech can probably get better, but we will forever have the USB-C connector. They can increase transmission rate, to a limit, with the existing connector.
I'm sure they said the same thing about the mini-usb and micro-usb. The point is no one can accurately predict where tech will be in 5 years. I remember when my new 20MB hard drive was more space than I would ever use
Its about time. HurrahThe EU confirmed an earlier agreement (see the opening post) on this proposal. The final vote: 602 in favor, 13 against.
European Parliament passes legislation introducing universal charger
New law would make USB type-C the standard port for most devices.www.politico.eu
While it is good for the consumer, I am not cheering for this new legislation. The government should mind its own business. This new law isn't going to save the planet. If it saved money, wouldn't a free market have already made the change?Its about time. Hurrah
The EU confirmed an earlier agreement (see the opening post) on this proposal. The final vote: 602 in favor, 13 against.
European Parliament passes legislation introducing universal charger
New law would make USB type-C the standard port for most devices.www.politico.eu
I agree. I also bought the $40 charger. It’s actually the fast charger so that was worth it to me. But going to the new USB cord on the wrong side was rather dumb.Cliff and I share a charger. His iPhone bought in February charges on my iPhone charger from three years ago. But to use the cord that came with his phone requires separate purchase of a plug to fit it. My memory says that was $40, but if even half that amount I am incensed that a $600 phone requires the purchase of a plug to charge.
Not always the best one. There is pretty much agreement that Beta was superior technology to VHS. Moot point, though. They're both obsolete. Dinosaurs. Extinct. (pardon me. I have one- I'm a dinosaur too.VHS vs BETA one tech always wins eventually in the open market.