I respect your opinion, of course.
And it's only that---an opinion, and worth every penny anyone paid for it. (Which, in this case, is zero.)
But, I think it is worth thinking about. Myrtle Beach
probably will have good trade power for a long time. But, it is not certain---I've lived through at least two global revaluations that each took many different former tiger traders in RCI and cut them off at the knees, and that's just in the last 15 years or so. Disney
probably won't leave RCI for II, until suddenly they do. There are many ways that exchange can go sideways, and I've seen at least a half dozen of them that completely changed the way I get DVC exchanges and what those exchanges might be. That's with a fairly broad portfolio of different ownerships, some dual-affiliated, etc.
In other words, if you are counting on one particular resort ownership to accomplish one particular exchange goal year after year, then IMO you are asking for trouble.
One alternative is to buy into a mini-system that one can use most of the time, and treat trading as a very nice bonus. That way, if your primary reason for trading does become harder/impossible, you still have something you own that you can get good use out of. WorldMark, Wyndham, and Bluegreen all could serve this role if the underlying resort network is attractive.
Getting started in RCI and finding you don't have the right combination doesn't mean you have to or even should focus on doing RCI "better." There are other ways to hedge your bets.
We do tend to forget as timeshare owners that our learning curve was drastic, and if we can help keep another person from experiencing that trial and error, it's a good thing.
Exactly. But that also means that if we learned, over time, that a particular strategy is risky and worth thinking twice about, it is worth sharing that lesson too.