isisdave
TUG Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 2,803
- Reaction score
- 1,333
- Location
- Evansville IN
- Resorts Owned
- Marriott Waiohai
I recently attended my annual cardiology visit. I know my systolic BP has been up to 130, measured on my wrist meter. The nurse first announced 160/90 (and this was following the correct protocol, waiting 5 minutes, etc.) and then a few minutes later 150/80.
I had brought my wrist unit, and it said 131/72. Twice.
They're sure they're right, and they probably are. I couldn't find my old arm cuff monitor, which used to agree quite closely with the wrist one, so I bought another. It's even weirder. If I take three measurements a few minutes apart without moving my arm, I can get 132, 145, and 122. I did notice with the arm monitor that it's important to get the "index" right in the middle of the arm; otherwise it reads high. But it can read high anyway. Or low ...
The wrist monitor is sensitive to height. It needs to be at "heart level." So I usually perform the "Hail Caesar" salute to get the right elevation, then straighten my arm. It's more consistent, but like 20 mmHg less than the nurse gets.
I'm going back in a week to evaluate a new med. I'm taking both monitors. I find it disappointing that the 21st century has brought us immunotherapy and similar high-tech advances, but something as basic -- and important -- as blood pressure is still difficult to measure.
Does anyone have any experience to share about at-home measurements, either vs professional or about consistency? Or suggestions for positioning either your wrist or the cuff?
I had brought my wrist unit, and it said 131/72. Twice.
They're sure they're right, and they probably are. I couldn't find my old arm cuff monitor, which used to agree quite closely with the wrist one, so I bought another. It's even weirder. If I take three measurements a few minutes apart without moving my arm, I can get 132, 145, and 122. I did notice with the arm monitor that it's important to get the "index" right in the middle of the arm; otherwise it reads high. But it can read high anyway. Or low ...
The wrist monitor is sensitive to height. It needs to be at "heart level." So I usually perform the "Hail Caesar" salute to get the right elevation, then straighten my arm. It's more consistent, but like 20 mmHg less than the nurse gets.
I'm going back in a week to evaluate a new med. I'm taking both monitors. I find it disappointing that the 21st century has brought us immunotherapy and similar high-tech advances, but something as basic -- and important -- as blood pressure is still difficult to measure.
Does anyone have any experience to share about at-home measurements, either vs professional or about consistency? Or suggestions for positioning either your wrist or the cuff?