oldmimbler
Guest
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2022
- Messages
- 79
- Reaction score
- 36
- Points
- 28
First, hello everyone and thank you for having such a wonderful and informative community. So far my experience with timesharing was limited to attending Wyndham sales presentation couple years ago. I didn't buy anything there -- I don't remember a lot of details, but I went there with an attitude "they must be pushing some really bad deal if they're paying 100 bucks to people like me just to listen to it" . After the presentation I though I'd need to read more about it, and been going through forums for a while, and how have a couple questions.
As far as I understand, there are two totally different types of timeshares:
1. "Deed" system, where you actually own a time period in piece of property. You're guaranteed this period no matter what and it cannot be taken from you (as long as fees are paid). Was just curious what would happen if the property gets destroyed by a natural disaster, and the sales guy didn't have a reasonable response here. But, lacking this, it is yours to stay. There's an option to trade it in and get a week somewhere else, but this doesn't seem valuable to me because then why not just book somewhere else, shall be cheaper if all fees taken into account?
This scenario makes sense to me if one wants to go to a specific place during specific time for the next X years, and is sure about it. I do see the value here, as the alternative is too expensive (basically buy a property there and let it empty/rent it).
2. "Points" system or I forgot how they called it. Here you don't really own anything, you're just granted a right to book something from the list at a discounted rate. You are not guaranteed any availability anywhere, however, and the property may be sold out because someone (paying cash or higher than you in a point hierarchy) has booked it before you were allowed to book.
Now this scenario makes no sense to me, and I don't see value in this system. Is the value based solely on the fact that if you happen to book it, you'd pay less than if you'd tried to book the same property on expedia/hotwire using the rack rate? But then, who pays rack rates unless it's something like Rio Carnival week and I've shown up without a booking? Even the status hierarchy doesn't make much sense, because it creates an incentive for Wyndham to keep adding new, higher statuses - meaning the top "diamond" status you have today may give you everything, but tomorrow they add a "double diamond" pushing you back. Yes, the sales guy said Wyndham would never do this, but this was ridiculous - it's an open business opportunity, so Wyndham would be stupid not to raise money this way, unless I miss something.
Finally, in my case, is the conclusion right that no timeshare market makes sense to me? I travel very often (been to 100+ countries), but I generally grab last minute deals, an accommodation is acceptable to me as long as it has private bathroom and heating/air conditioning, and I can enumerate every single instance I had to pay more than $100/night for a hotel?
As far as I understand, there are two totally different types of timeshares:
1. "Deed" system, where you actually own a time period in piece of property. You're guaranteed this period no matter what and it cannot be taken from you (as long as fees are paid). Was just curious what would happen if the property gets destroyed by a natural disaster, and the sales guy didn't have a reasonable response here. But, lacking this, it is yours to stay. There's an option to trade it in and get a week somewhere else, but this doesn't seem valuable to me because then why not just book somewhere else, shall be cheaper if all fees taken into account?
This scenario makes sense to me if one wants to go to a specific place during specific time for the next X years, and is sure about it. I do see the value here, as the alternative is too expensive (basically buy a property there and let it empty/rent it).
2. "Points" system or I forgot how they called it. Here you don't really own anything, you're just granted a right to book something from the list at a discounted rate. You are not guaranteed any availability anywhere, however, and the property may be sold out because someone (paying cash or higher than you in a point hierarchy) has booked it before you were allowed to book.
Now this scenario makes no sense to me, and I don't see value in this system. Is the value based solely on the fact that if you happen to book it, you'd pay less than if you'd tried to book the same property on expedia/hotwire using the rack rate? But then, who pays rack rates unless it's something like Rio Carnival week and I've shown up without a booking? Even the status hierarchy doesn't make much sense, because it creates an incentive for Wyndham to keep adding new, higher statuses - meaning the top "diamond" status you have today may give you everything, but tomorrow they add a "double diamond" pushing you back. Yes, the sales guy said Wyndham would never do this, but this was ridiculous - it's an open business opportunity, so Wyndham would be stupid not to raise money this way, unless I miss something.
Finally, in my case, is the conclusion right that no timeshare market makes sense to me? I travel very often (been to 100+ countries), but I generally grab last minute deals, an accommodation is acceptable to me as long as it has private bathroom and heating/air conditioning, and I can enumerate every single instance I had to pay more than $100/night for a hotel?