• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 30 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 30th anniversary: Happy 30th Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $21,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $21 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    60,000+ subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

DICING WITH DEATH Wuhan ‘leak’ lab scientists ‘planned to release souped-up coronaviruses into BAT CAVES before Covid outbreak’

DannyTS

TUG Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
5,753
Reaction score
3,076
Points
348
I don't know why I am being quoted by Danny here. I said nothing about the Lancet magazine nor is there anything in the articles that I quoted about the Lancet.

As far as what is found in Lancet, I think it should be noted that Lancet itself has not taken a position on the origin. What is being referenced are three letters that they published. In other words, there is a difference of opinion among the readers of Lancet.

I did reference a story I saw on Yahoo that leaned toward the natural origin theory in that I thought that readers of this thread should be aware of both sides of the arguments. That story was breaking news. Nature (a very well respected science journal) has now published a story on that study (link) but notes that the study has not been peer reviewed. Their account of the study is worth reading.

In closing, I still maintain that the jury is out and I am not totally convinced by any of the articles that I have seen proclaiming that the virus was created in the Wuhan lab nor articles that claim that the virus had a natural origin. Actually, I would add a third alternative. The origin is in bats, but guano from those bats, along with the guano from many other bats, was brought to the Wuhan lab for study, but given the poor safety measures of the lab, the virus escaped from there. In other words, not purposely created, but the Wuhan lab is responsible for its escape.

Sorry for being cryptic in my comment, I quoted you because it actually presents both sides of the argument which is exactly your position.
 

"Roger"

TUG Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,436
Reaction score
3,298
Points
598
Thanks for explaining.
 
Top