Wasn't it determined though, that in your prior thread you were in fact comparing two different documents? One of the exchange procedures and another that was a full disclosure document that also happened to contain the exchange procedures?
That’s what happens, in my opinion, when people who pretend to be industry experts, demonstrate that they are not. There are nearly 100 pages of documents, that’s a lot of data, and a lot of details.
Remember, when the new exchange documents came out, several people stated that the changes were limited to the addition of two new ownership/membership levels. I did a cursory review of the document, in part, because I did not buy that conclusion, and I quickly concluded that that was not the case. Instead, in fairly short order (< 24 hours), I got a few industry experts to take a look at the document, and between our quick, cursory review, and an AI Analysis, we produced the document that was posted. Was it likely that the comparison document had shortcomings, ABSOLUTELY; that, to me, comes with the territory, and a 24 hour turn-around. HOWEVER, what is clear is that the document was not limited to the addition of two new ownership/membership categories, the changes are far-reaching, and that the devil is in the details. The impact of the May 2026 changes, in my opinion, will touch each user, differently, depending upon how they use their ownership. At the end, though, the comparison, in my opinion, is a very effective, generalized assessment of the scope of changes, and, if my memory is right, when I published it, and to this point, forward, no one else has produced a document of similar scope, NOR (most worrisome), has Marriott Vacations Worldwide.
In terms of the phraseology and nomenclature associated with the documents, I addressed this, previously; I suspect any confusion that exists, exists because non-real estate professionals, are attempting to understand the natural progression of such documents, over time.