As I said, the article is interesting.
My point is the fact that it mentions current political candidates and directs the person reading, by way of clearly marked links, to the agendas of both "Elizabeth Warren" and "Bernie Sanders". Do we really need to bring any political candidate into the picture regardless if it's one line or half a paragraph? I can't recall there being a set number of lines that determine if a political agenda should or should not be discussed. I'm simply trying to determine if that agenda, which is part of the article, can be discussed.
We agree, the basis for the article may not be political in nature however, the author found it necessary to include the links. By doing so, they become part of the article.