That would be my worry too. Let's say you go and pick up two SVVs from eBay for peanuts. You count on the 81,000 SO unit combined with 67,100 SO one to get you into 2BR LOs that are usually 148,100 SOs.
Well guess what? The economy picks up and Starwood decides it is no longer convenient for them to combine resale M SOs and they pull the plug on this benefit. You are stuck with separate 1BR and studio units from there on out -- with no guarantees that they will join them together for you (and your little kids). Not good. This is a nice new feature but I would definitely NOT rely on this being available in the long run.
Katherine
Something else to consider: Servicing owners through the resale market with options split (not combined) was more trouble to them. In other words, making multiple reservations as an example....
Lets say you owned 81,000 + 67,100 via resale. You wanted a lock-off in platinum season....the reservation agent needs to make two reservations...which means....
1.) Longer talk time = cost (Call centers are meant to be efficient)
2.) Coordinating and handling room assignments for two reservations - unncessary time spent. (more cost)
3.) More steps = more room for error = cost on compensation (potentially)
4.) Owner says they have a party of 8, small children etc and they need to have adjacent rooms (true lock-off). Why go through the hassle to say that the request cannot be guaranteed. Telling an owner that they cannot guarantee a request like to this to ensure the well being of their family WILL mean more time spent handling this situation even if it has to go through management.
This is ultimately one of those situations where it is simply smarter business to accomodate and to allow StarOptions to combine. Would this really motivate buyers to stay away from resale when there are opportunities out there for $0.20 on the dollar? I dont think so.