im sure there is a logical explanation for the math not adding up.....but i cant get to 100% no matter what lol.
some questions simply shouldnt allow for multiple answers, especially if hte goal is to make a chart or graph based on the % of responses!
IMO posting the questions asked for each of those cited charts/graphs would go a long way into explaining why the numbers are weird.
If the info is true, I think one of the mindboggling aspects to me is implication of just how many people own months in timeshares along with how many are booking 4+ units at a time. I think this is quite the mindbender for people who (like on TUG) tend to think of TS ownership in terms of discrete weeks. For us, I think it'd be way more informative to normalize over weeks. I.e. if you own 4 weeks, you don't answer one multiple selection permitted question on use, but answer on a per week or per contract (for points) basis. It's still a bit weird for points, but again, I also tend to think most people on TUG think about whatever their MF "chunks" are.
I.e. instead of per owner it's per week/ownership interest contract. And really, I'd still think some attempt to normalize the ownership interests / points back to an average week cost or something would be useful. Because like in my previous example, "not being able to use or save" 300 HGVC points is different from 6,000 even though the 6,000 isn't necessarily going to get you a week.
Now that I'm thinking about this more, HGVC still makes sense as weeks as that's how it's sold underlying, but Wyndham is not - IDK if I'd normalize my 405,000 points as one or two weeks (or potentially more I guess), because it depends so much on time and location and I've got nothing to point (as a resale owner) to what it was even conceptualized as to the original owner. Maybe something like percentage of ownership used, rented , wasted? With weeks it'd be stark blocks, but in all the points system I would bet that as long as you're getting over 90% the owners are likely still happyish. But it also would be interesting to know how many people are getting value vs not in reality.
