There are several differences between “regular” HGVC and by Hilton Club (bHC). The properties are supposedly different in that regular HGVC is more resort/vacation condo like while bHC is more hotel like. Here is an overview:
- bHC has less restriction on non home week length of stay (one night) than regular HGVC (three night). bHC also has a home resort booking advantage (where owners of that property can book at your home resort any length of stay any season) of 9 months to 1.5 months. Regular HGVC has no such booking rules. Once the home season reservation window is up (at 9 months) any HGVC owners (including bHC) can book at that resort.
- bHC seems to be more in the middle of urban areas while HGVC is more traditional vacation spots. With properties in NYC, DC, Charleston and potential in Chicago (not convinced this won’t be bHC) and San Francisco, they are in the middle of theater and night life districts. Even the new Waikiki resort is more downtown Honolulu than beach. With the exception of the Vegas properties, regular HGVC seem to be more beach/ski/family vacation type places. Even the Japan bHC (a hot spring spa) is a place most wouldn’t stay a week at.
- Right now, bHC has a higher buy in price point and MF’s than most of regular HGVC (some of the Hawaii resorts have very high buy in points).
With their shorter stay limits and locations in the middle of the urban nightlife, shopping, food and such, the bHC seems, at least to me, to be used more for hotel like stays. Go NYC for shows often? bHC is the way to go. Regular HGVC would be a better place for a weeks worth of family vacations.
If I am wrong on this, please set me straight!