For starters, OP should rescind that Westgate purchase immediately and ask (many and different) questions later, IMO.
Secondly, anything emanating from the mouths of any developer salesperson must be taken with a grain of salt.
Sales weasels are not exactly known for their forthright honesty or factual accuracy. On the contrary, their strong suits tend to be deceit, exaggeration, misrepresentation, outright lies and general obfuscation. Just sayin'...
Next, since Westgate deliberately devalues resale market purchases of Westgate ownerships (by imposing very restrictive reservation policies and constraints upon resale market purchasers of Westgate products), it can be reasonably argued that after buying developer-direct from Westgate (
regardless of price paid), the "value" of that Westgate purchase (apart from the value inherent in its' actual use and enjoyment) moves downward in a straight line directly toward
zero, immediately upon expiration of the contract rescission period.
Everything else is irrelevant detail, IMnsHO. Rescind now OP, or forever regret failing to do so while you had the chance.
After you rescind, research and learn which system best suits you, I would recommend confining your purchase search and options to the resale market (except for Westgate, which should just simply be avoided entirely, IMnsHO).
There is really no need (or any good reason) to pay exorbitant developer-direct prices. After all, when you think about it,
every timeshare is actually a "used" product, irrespective of the seller involved. Every unit is occupied for a week by 50 different sets of occupants in the course of a year. There is no "magic" (or any particular benefit) associated with a developer-direct purchase, but most developer sales people will never mention (or even openly acknowledge the
existence of) the resale market. To do so would obviously not be in
their best financial interests --- their only concern.
To just compare one developer's full freight prices with another developer's full freight prices seems (to me, anyhow) not particularly useful or informative. No personal offense or disrespect intended, but that is really a "tunnel vision" approach which fails to even consider or examine other better (i.e., resale market) options. That said, to each their own. YMMV.