I 'liked' the post from
@LisaRex but I wanted to further that by saying a more comprehensive thank you. That is one of the best posts I've seen on Tug, potentially ever. It was thorough and thoughtful, and included citations.
I don't own at any of the Maui resorts (although I've been there a few times, either on packages or as a renter). I think the best thing owners there could do would be gather up those 13k names from the deeds and send everyone a printout of that post by lisarex, and ask them to contact their board about why their costs are so much higher.
My personal opinion, is that Vistana raises MF to approximately the usage value of the lowest season unit. As evidence for this, I comment that WKORV fees are lower than WKORVN which are lower than Nanea. WKORV is held down by the island view deluxe units, which are getting pretty close to zero value, imo. WKORVN is a bit higher because there are no outliers, and nanea is even higher because they assigned more maintenance to the ocean front units so they can get more money there without raising the MF on the resort view out of line with value. This pattern is broadly repeated across the portfolio, with low season units at most resorts worth ~0, but the MF increases always seem to stop there, and even though vistana doesn't do takebacks directly there aren't many units with a deeply negative value.
I'm not sure why they'd do that, maybe they use any money in excess of the actual expenses to purchase things from affiliated companies to pad their own bottom line. There was some discussion awhile back about what various resorts were spending on buying cable/telephone services from a Vistana owned company, as one example.
If anyone decides to actually do a mail out, I'd be happy to contribute something to the cost even though I wouldn't personally benefit from any changes.