<snip> ... they asked for a notarized statement that we are accepting responsibility for the ongoing MFs-which, with a purchase agreement, seems a little unnecessary. <snip>
I have no interest in defending GW or their new practice, but IMnsHO the new practice
does actually makes some sense (...even if it seems somewhat redundant).
When you think about it, it's just one additional (and harmless to honest people) means by which to help ensure (not guaranty, but at least
help to ensure) that a real person of verifiable identity is not only making the purchase, but also
overtly acknowledging, under signature, their knowledge, understanding and acceptance of the contractual responsibilities associated with their imminent purchase. Additionally, GW probably regards the exercise as some additional legal "CYA" for themselves, from the standpoint of potential future liability with the resort (...
regardless of the purchase price involved in any particular transaction).
In an era of widespread identity fraud, far too many scammers, bogus LLC's, and ghost Viking Ships sailing the timeshare seas, it frankly would not surprise me if this particular practice becomes
more widespread and common among resellers, despite it being inconvenient and / or unwelcome from the buyer point of view.