It isn't the stress, PJ. It's the contrast. I've spent this week arranging a funeral, writing an obituary, lining up the speakers and musical numbers and, finally, writing and delivering a eulogy of one of the kindest, gentlest persons I have ever known. All week I have been considering and pondering the life of a guileless person. Then to come to this thread and read denigrating comments about a young woman's character based on her brief, initial reaction to disappointment was like a slap in the face. Aren't we better than that? It's one thing to comment on what we think about a person's performance but quite another to make moral character judgements.
It's one thing to consider that the judges are not giving constructive criticism and quite another to think they are bad because they aren't as mean as Simon Cowell. Meaness is not the same as constructive.
I fear I have, in the past, made similar comments about people. I don't want to be like that. I don't want to be a character assassin. It's a type of violence. Isn't there enough violence and hatred in the world without adding to it with snide comments?
Can't we be better than that? We don't know who does or doesn't have "additional difficulties." Sure, some of them have been spotlighted but that doesn't mean the others do not have personal challenges. I just means they've kept it to themselves.
Sending my condolences and prayers for your family, Rose PInk...I know you've been through quite a bit and have been willing to share some of that here. Please stick around. I like reading your posts
Truly, when we lose a good person, it often makes us take a step back and look at ourselves as well. We also become very sensitive as our emotions are heightened. I mean no disrespect here - actually I admire you for saying how you feel. I would like to think that most people think of themselves as "good" and "kind." Yet we lose sight of that in our day to day interactions, sometimes. Here in the lounge, it's easy to armchair referee, and we feel we can say what's on our minds. I wish they didn't do some of the things they do or say some of the things they say, because it is remembered and talked about and shapes opinions about them. Actually, I start out pulling for all of them, but can't help wishing they'd get better advice before wearing some of the clothes they wear, or saying/doing some of the things they do. But these things do shape our opinions of them, for good or bad, and I think it's fair to say so.
TV has a way of being able to shape our opinions (sometimes intentionally, sometimes not) about the people we see - whether celebrities, politicians, or reality contestants. As you say, much of our perceptions are based on how the show is edited and what we get to see or not see. This is why it is hard when AI gives us back stories for some, but not other contestants. This plays into early voting, as there are people who make the final 12 who the audience is unfamiliar with, and others that have already gotten a lot of exposure. The kids are told to show spirit and fight, yet also to "make a connection" with the audience. Then the show gets edited. Scotty early on talked about his grandmother, and earned a lot of "aw, shucks" votes. Very little back story was ever given about Haley. It wasn't until they did the recap as she left the show that they touched upon the fact that this was her second attempt at making the show. Who knows how much work and effort she put in to making her dreams come true??
Still, ultimately it will come down to the music they make and their choices as to whether they will be successful artists or not. Looking back at the hundreds of contestants that have gotten national exposure, it has been interesting to see what they do next.