That they were one and the same was known years ago, like 2011 I think, but I suppose folks forgot.
You are right, I have not hidden this fact and, by the way, Ron knew this to.
I do not know what the hidden agenda is.
That they were one and the same was known years ago, like 2011 I think, but I suppose folks forgot.
True, but checking it periodically is now habit hoping for new information on whether there has been resolution, which thus far, has not happened except for a single poster and Ron, who is more "settled" than " resolved."
That could be a semantics thing however.
Continues to be extremely disturbing it has gone on this long.
Yes, I got a notification that he quoted my post, and then it was not there when I went to look. It makes it seem like we are all talking to ourselves.
Edit - I've just found out that ignoring some users results in seeing the post with a note "You are ignoring content by this member. Show Ignored Content", while some other users don't display the post at all. It makes my post here seem pretty strange in context of the full thread.
Both Ron and scootr5 new rrlongwell and lcm11 were the same person a long time ago.
So, two resolved, one of which is once again a fully functional account and the other not functional but pending settlement.I suppose it depends on how you define your terms.. but i would say my situation is resolved, but not yet settled
WJ, there is a whole history with RRL (aka Robert, RRLongwell, lcm11) and it has nothing to do wtih the OT of this thread. The guys are obsessing about identity, you're not missing anything of any signifigant consequence related to this thread.What am I missing? If this is Robert, why does the "real name" field say it's Laura? Why the disguise?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What am I missing? If this is Robert, why does the "real name" field say it's Laura? Why the disguise?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WJ, there is a whole history with RRL (aka Robert, RRLongwell, lcm11) and it has nothing to do wtih the OT of this thread. The guys are obsessing about identity, you're not missing anything of any signifigant consequence related to this thread.
Any new update on your suspension status? How are you holding up?
Any new update on your suspension status? How are you holding up?
No update at all. A few days from hitting my six month anniversary of my account suspension.
Basically my suspensions has lasted longer than one of Kim Kardashian's marriages.
Frustration is still high but has reached a point of being more surreal. The first two weeks were angst ridden. I couldn't sleep well due to worry. Now it's drug out so long that it's almost comical. I've got to figure once a Wyndham rep contacts me to reconcile he or she is going to have to be hugely embarrassed and ashamed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm good I just wanted to clarify, as much as I can, where I amSo, two resolved, one of which is once again fully functional and the other not functional but pending settlement.
Better?
Just trying to keep track, not prying.
No update at all. A few days from hitting my six month anniversary of my account suspension.
Basically my suspensions has lasted longer than one of Kim Kardashian's marriages.
Frustration is still high but has reached a point of being more surreal. The first two weeks were angst ridden. I couldn't sleep well due to worry. Now it's drug out so long that it's almost comical. I've got to figure once a Wyndham rep contacts me to reconcile he or she is going to have to be hugely embarrassed and ashamed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would not count on a Wyndham rep being hugely embarrassed or ashamed. Remember, all actions taken by Wyndham to this point have indicated a bias in the corporate thinking that this points discrepancy is somehow YOUR fault.
Good observation. Perhaps the embarrassment will emanate from the fact it's taken six months. Tom Brady hadn't started his four game suspension when this debacle started, and now he won his fifth Super Bowl. And entire NFL football season has come and gone and still this episode trudges on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I would not count on a Wyndham rep being hugely embarrassed or ashamed. Remember, all actions taken by Wyndham to this point have indicated a bias in the corporate thinking that this points discrepancy is somehow YOUR fault.
Ummm... that makes no sense and is unlikely since WYN initiated the suspensions in the first place.For those people who have not worked it out with Wyndham by now may be faced with it not working out. Wyndham may have just moved on.
Rob, in the final analysis, how do you think WYN will be able to make it the Owners fault for their poor accounting and system problems? With a few exceptions, like Ron who has openly stated he abused and took advantage of the loopholes in the system, many of the suspended owners are just owners using the system as they were instructed to do based on the information provided to them by Wyndham. There was no overt attempt to snake the system or intent to damage Wyn. Some even attempted to identify the problem by contacting Wyn and pointing out the discrepancies, which reflects a considerable amount of good ethics. As a counter response, they get suspended and put on perma-hold with no communication while still being required to continue to pay MF's to keep their account in good standing.I would not count on a Wyndham rep being hugely embarrassed or ashamed. Remember, all actions taken by Wyndham to this point have indicated a bias in the corporate thinking that this points discrepancy is somehow YOUR fault.
So, two resolved, one of which is once again a fully functional account and the other not functional but pending settlement.
Better?
Just trying to keep track, not prying.
True, but checking it periodically is now habit hoping for new information on whether there has been resolution, which thus far, has not happened except for a single poster and Ron, who is more "settled" than " resolved."
That could be a semantics thing however.
Continues to be extremely disturbing it has gone on this long.
As irritating as that statement is, it's sadly probably true and is reflective of WYN disparaging attutude toward owners in general.
Ummm... that makes no sense and is unlikely since WYN initiated the suspensions in the first place.
At some point they have to CLOSE the audit. They cannot keep an owner, who is paying ongoing MF's and keeping their account in good standing financially, permanetly suspended. The owner is paying for services they are NOT getting "in good faith" -- at some point a reconciliation or settlement will need to happen. These owners have contracts that are deeded or, at the very least (CWA) says "in exchange for my MF WYN gives me XX points/yr to use in their system for travel and travel services.". (yadda yadda paraphrasing here). To put them in a perma-hold indefinitely that includes payment without service becomes breach of contract.
Major status change regarding my situation happened today. Although there are a few loose ends to tie down, it would be more correct than not to use the word "settled"
Robert, you have at least 30+ pages of catchup reading to do on this thread. That issue has already been discussed.If anyone had the suspension in effect at the end of their use year, were points lost?
GTK that shift happens for some and here's to wishing that your major change is to your best benefit given the circumstances.Major status change regarding my situation happened today. Although there are a few loose ends to tie down, it would be more correct than not to use the word "settled"
Rob, in the finale analysis, how do you think WYN will be able to make it the Owners fault for their poor accounting and system problems? With a few exceptions, like Ron who has openly stated he abused and took advantage of the loopholes in the system, many of the suspended owners are just owners using the system as they were instructed to do based on the information provided to them by Wyndham. There was no overt attempt to snake the system or intent to damage Wyn. Some even attempted to identify the problem by contacting Wyn and pointing out the discrepancies, which reflects a considerable amount of good ethics. As a counter response, they get suspended and put on perma-hold with no communication while still being required to continue to pay MF's to keep their account in good standing.
Where in that process has the owner shown "fault?"
Not attacking you personally but interested in the potential circular logic that could be devised to justify fault in these scenarios.
This is a good example of scatter logic.The logic appears to be simple, it appears to be up to them when to suspend or not, at least in the early rounds.