What if...what if the resort has a exit program where if the week owner wanted out, and choose the resorts program to exit versus other options and it was standard in the industry. The owner remains responsible for the maintenance fees until sold (and is anyway). A resort entity (developer/owners association) takes control of the week, and rents it out with 40% of the proceeds returned to reduce the owners maintenance fees. The resort entity lists the units for sale, even for free (owner pays closing), using 30% of the rental proceeds (if rented) to offset costs.
Yes, a bad business model on one hand, but the object is to give a owner or potential buyer a worst case scenario exit option. And there are benefits of sort. The maintenance fees are likely to have fewer delinquencies, the TS industry stops getting bashed as much and might be a few more units available for the points traders. No one is going to get rich, but no one is getting rich as the exits are now, there is no doubt a cost to the current dump and run exit strategies to everyone. On a resort to resort basis most weeks are NOT for sale or being dumped so this is a small issue, people are there at the resort and keeping a list and employing minimal marketing, the costs can be kept small.
So the scenario "I paid all of that $25,000 at the beginning. I've been giving you $1000 m/l every year since. You've given me a week's vacation every year. We're even. You keep the $25,000. I'll give you another $1000, and let's call it quits." is close to reality.