• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 30 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 30th anniversary: Happy 30th Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $21,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $21 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    60,000+ subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

Marriott/Vistana overlay

JIMinNC

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,879
Reaction score
4,429
Points
599
Location
Marvin, NC (Charlotte) & Hilton Head Island, SC
Resorts Owned
Marriott:
Maui Ocean Club
Waiohai Beach Club
Barony Beach Club
Abound ClubPoints
HGVC:
HGVC at Sea World
I think we would all be well served to try to avoid implying that a developer like Marriott Vacations Worldwide has a "revenue stream in maintenance fees." As I know you are well aware, the maintenance fees themselves actually go to the HOA, and show up on the HOA income statement. The reliable revenue stream to MVW actually comes from the management fee that shows up as an expense item on that HOA income statement. I realize this is a nuance that is sort of nit-picky for folks like us who understand how all this stuff actually works - and I've made similar comments myself in the past - but I've seen many discussions over the years where it's been a source of confusion for some people. So, when we are talking about the developer themselves, I would suggest that it's more technically accurate to state our point like this:

They have a reliable revenue stream in management fees...

yes. I made the short form claim for maintenance fees going to the developer. They do end up going to them indirectly through the HOA. Since they make a % off the total, I don't see any incentive for them to keep fees low. But since they also own units until they are sold as points/weeks, they have some incentive to keep the fees low. Otherwise why wouldn't they increase the MF as much as possible so they can get get a bigger revenue?

ski_sierra makes a good point, so I will offer one clarification...I believe the maintenance fees collected do actually appear on Marriott Vacations Worldwide's corporate income statement, since there is a large income line item on the 10-K "Cost Reimbursements" ($925 Million in 2018, second only to Sales Revenue), but the key is, that Revenue line is directly and exactly offset by an expense item also called "Cost Reimbursements" ($925 Million also in 2018). The 10-K defines "Cost Reimbursements" as:

Cost reimbursements include direct and indirect costs that are reimbursed to us by customers under management contracts. All costs, with the exception of taxes assessed by a governmental authority, reimbursed to us by customers are reported on a gross basis. We recognize cost reimbursements when we incur the related reimbursable costs. Cost reimbursements consist of actual expenses with no added margin.

I interpret these offsetting revenue/expense line items as the Maintenance fees collected on behalf of the HOAs by MVW Corporate and the expenses paid out on behalf of the HOAs. So, while the Management Fee is the only component of maintenance fees that truly flows to the bottom line of MVW, it's probably incorrect on my part to imply that the maintenance fees are totally independent of the MVW income statement - they may be there, but only on a pass-thru basis since MVW handles the collection of fees and disbursements to vendors.

Here is some additional color on that topic, also from the 10-K:

We provide day-to-day-management services, including housekeeping services, operation of reservation systems, maintenance and certain accounting and administrative services for property owners’ associations, condominium owners and hotels.

We generate revenue from fees we earn for managing vacation ownership resorts, clubs, owners’ associations, condominiums and hotels. In our Vacation Ownership segment, these fees are earned regardless of usage or occupancy and are typically based on either a percentage of the budgeted costs to operate the resorts or a fixed fee arrangement (“VO management fee revenues”). ... In addition, we receive reimbursement of costs incurred on behalf of our customers, which consist of actual expenses with no added margin (“cost reimbursements”). Vacation Ownership segment cost reimbursements revenues exclude amounts that we have paid to the property owners’ associations related to maintenance fees for unsold vacation ownership products, as we have concluded that such payments are consideration payable to a customer.
 
Last edited:

bizaro86

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
3,663
Reaction score
2,488
Points
598
Location
Calgary, AB, Canada
yes. I made the short form claim for maintenance fees going to the developer. They do end up going to them indirectly through the HOA. Since they make a % off the total, I don't see any incentive for them to keep fees low. But since they also own units until they are sold as points/weeks, they have some incentive to keep the fees low. Otherwise why wouldn't they increase the MF as much as possible so they can get get a bigger revenue?

Higher MF makes it harder to sell new units. The history of timesharing shows this motivation very clearly. In every single developer operated project I'm aware of, fees have increased by materially more than inflation in the first years after sellout. There are a few reasons for this - the MF are generally initially subsidized by the developer to ease sales. There are also tricks to reduce MF initially (commonly used by whole ownership condos as well) such as initially underfunding reserves. I also believe (but cannot prove) that many of the developer controlled management companies begin to take liberties over time with their HOAs (by purchasing supplies and services from related parties, for example).

The use of a trust changes this dynamic. Because the MVC trust will never sell out, they don't really subsidize it initially. They also have more of an incentive to keep the MF low over time, because the ability to sell more points is vastly more valuable than the ability to raise management revenue. I hadn't thought of it until now, but that is actually a potentially good reason to buy trust points. I suspect they will endeavor to keep the MF low, maybe moreso than other developers. That said, I would say HGVC has the best record for keeping MF reasonable among the hotel developers so far.
 

4Sunsets

newbie
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
205
Reaction score
32
Points
28
Because the MVC trust will never sell out, they don't really subsidize it initially. They also have more of an incentive to keep the MF low over time, because the ability to sell more points is vastly more valuable than the ability to raise management revenue. I hadn't thought of it until now, but that is actually a potentially good reason to buy trust points. I suspect they will endeavor to keep the MF low, maybe moreso than other developers. That said, I would say HGVC has the best record for keeping MF reasonable among the hotel developers so far.

Trust points in MVC have always been more expensive than week points comparatively, and with the increases trust points are in many cases substantially more. It's unfortunate, because MVC wants us all to buy into points but they make the points #1 so expensive compared to the weeks previous to points #2 make the MF higher than with weeks points and #3 make it practically impossible to resell your points and get any value back.

I agree on HGVC, so far it seems at most resorts, HGVC has. There are exceptions, however, where MF is very high.
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
47,362
Reaction score
18,926
Points
1,299
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
I think we would all be well served to try to avoid implying that a developer like Marriott Vacations Worldwide has a "revenue stream in maintenance fees." As I know you are well aware, the maintenance fees themselves actually go to the HOA, and show up on the HOA income statement. The reliable revenue stream to MVW actually comes from the management fee that shows up as an expense item on that HOA income statement. I realize this is a nuance that is sort of nit-picky for folks like us who understand how all this stuff actually works - and I've made similar comments myself in the past - but I've seen many discussions over the years where it's been a source of confusion for some people. So, when we are talking about the developer themselves, I would suggest that it's more technically accurate to state our point like this:

They have a reliable revenue stream in management fees...
Thanks for pointing this out. That is what I meant to say and missed typed it. I know better.
 

CalGalTraveler

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
9,745
Reaction score
8,272
Points
498
Location
California
Resorts Owned
HGVC, MVC Vistana
I think housekeeping/services are better at Vistana than MVC. My success rate at getting in by check-in time has been better.

Also, MVC doesn't have a midweek cleaning as a brand standard, which really should be the minimum for an upscale property imo. I believe all Vistana/HGVC properties do this, and even my silver crown independent does.

Just a data point. We are at HGVC Elara this weekend which is across the street from the MVC Grand Chateau. Although we are only here 4 nights with no midweek clean, they told us that we can call for towel changes and garbage pick up daily if desired with no extra fee. We requested today and they delivered within 15 minutes and came into the room to collect garbage which IMO is more upscale than having to leave outside door or putting in a trash dumpster yourself. MF here runs several hundred dollars lower than Grand Chateau

We stayed at Grand Chateau in March. Very nice and offered family activities. Elara doesn't have activities. Would rather pay for housekeeping/towel and trash than activities because this is Vegas with plenty to do. :)
 
Last edited:

DannyTS

TUG Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
5,753
Reaction score
3,076
Points
348
Honestly, IMHO there are very few Vistana properties that are Marriott caliber. Not a big fan of Marriott right now because of MF. However, Vistana? Not much there outside of the Hawaii locations.

Vistana owners are getting a great deal if they can get into Marriott's system. Marriott owners are NOT getting a good deal by the integration of Vistana properties. Marriott should have sold the weeds off.

According to Marriott, these are the Vistana "weeds": 4 category 7, 11 category 6 and only 4 category 5 resorts.

The question is: would the Marriott owners be better off if , theoretically speaking, Vistana was owned by HGVC instead? I think that we all know the answer.


upload_2019-6-7_8-17-55.png
 
Last edited:

mjm1

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
3,541
Reaction score
1,292
Points
548
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Resorts Owned
Marriott: Resorts and Destination Club Points;
Westin Kierland Villas;
HGVC Flamingo & Blvd;
Hyatt Pinon Pointe
According to Marriott, these are the Vistana "weeds": 4 category 7, 11 category 6 and only 4 category 5 resorts.

The question is: would the Marriott owners be better off if , theoretically speaking, Vistana was owned by HGVC instead? I think that we all know the answer to that.


View attachment 12253

Thanks for sharing the list. What category is Harborside at Atlantis? I couldn’t find it on Marriott.com.

Is Marriott is saying theses are “weeds” or is someone on TUG saying that from their own perspective. Either way I would disagree.

Best regards.

Mike
 

DannyTS

TUG Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
5,753
Reaction score
3,076
Points
348
Is Marriott is saying theses are “weeds” or is someone on TUG saying that from their own perspective. Either way I would disagree.

Best regards.

Mike
it was a comment made previously by 4Sunsets on Tug, see the top of my previous comment.
 

SteelerGal

TUG Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2019
Messages
1,758
Reaction score
835
Points
224
Resorts Owned
WKV, SDO, HPP, Bay Club
Thanks for sharing the list. What category is Harborside at Atlantis? I couldn’t find it on Marriott.com.

Is Marriott is saying theses are “weeds” or is someone on TUG saying that from their own perspective. Either way I would disagree.

Best regards.

Mike
Interesting that Maui dropped 10k.
 

tschwa2

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
16,002
Reaction score
4,676
Points
748
Location
Maryland
Resorts Owned
A few in S and VA, a single resort in NC, MD, PA, and UT, plus Jamaica and the Bahamas
Thanks for sharing the list. What category is Harborside at Atlantis? I couldn’t find it on Marriott.com.

Is Marriott is saying theses are “weeds” or is someone on TUG saying that from their own perspective. Either way I would disagree.

Best regards.

Mike
Harborside is not part of Marriott hotels as far as I can tell. You can book the other sections of Atlantis through Marriott.com and it is considered autograph collection but Harborside is not part of that.
 

controller1

TUG Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2017
Messages
3,042
Reaction score
1,940
Points
298
Location
Tulsa
Resorts Owned
Westin KORVN OF
Westin Nanea OF
Westin FLEX
According to Marriott, these are the Vistana "weeds": 4 category 7, 11 category 6 and only 4 category 5 resorts.

The question is: would the Marriott owners be better off if , theoretically speaking, Vistana was owned by HGVC instead? I think that we all know the answer.


View attachment 12253

A reminder that Marriott does not attach Category numbers to the properties based on quality (such as a AAA or Michelin rating) but instead the categories are assigned based on the popularity of award reservations for the property.
 

bizaro86

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
3,663
Reaction score
2,488
Points
598
Location
Calgary, AB, Canada
A reminder that Marriott does not attach Category numbers to the properties based on quality (such as a AAA or Michelin rating) but instead the categories are assigned based on the popularity of award reservations for the property.

Are you sure that's how it works? When Starwood was independent, categories were set based on ADR (average daily rate). I would guess marriott does something similar, because they have to pay the hotel's for the rooms, and "popularity" will be less important to the hotel owners than money.
 

dioxide45

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
47,362
Reaction score
18,926
Points
1,299
Location
NE Florida
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista
Marriott Harbour Lake
Sheraton Vistana Villages
Club Wyndham CWA
Are you sure that's how it works? When Starwood was independent, categories were set based on ADR (average daily rate). I would guess marriott does something similar, because they have to pay the hotel's for the rooms, and "popularity" will be less important to the hotel owners than money.
The way that @controller1 mentioned is how Marriott allocated categories prior to their merger with Starwood. Do they still do it that way now after the merger? I am not sure.
 

controller1

TUG Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2017
Messages
3,042
Reaction score
1,940
Points
298
Location
Tulsa
Resorts Owned
Westin KORVN OF
Westin Nanea OF
Westin FLEX
A reminder that Marriott does not attach Category numbers to the properties based on quality (such as a AAA or Michelin rating) but instead the categories are assigned based on the popularity of award reservations for the property.

Are you sure that's how it works? When Starwood was independent, categories were set based on ADR (average daily rate). I would guess marriott does something similar, because they have to pay the hotel's for the rooms, and "popularity" will be less important to the hotel owners than money.

The way that @controller1 mentioned is how Marriott allocated categories prior to their merger with Starwood. Do they still do it that way now after the merger? I am not sure.

According to the company reps on FlyerTalk, Marriott still utilizes award utilization for determining a property's Award Category.
 

bizaro86

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
3,663
Reaction score
2,488
Points
598
Location
Calgary, AB, Canada
According to the company reps on FlyerTalk, Marriott still utilizes award utilization for determining a property's Award Category.

Interesting. That is very different than how Starwood did it. It seems to me that should result in hotels in business cities being systemically underpriced compared to resort properties where more people will want to redeem.
 

controller1

TUG Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2017
Messages
3,042
Reaction score
1,940
Points
298
Location
Tulsa
Resorts Owned
Westin KORVN OF
Westin Nanea OF
Westin FLEX
Interesting. That is very different than how Starwood did it. It seems to me that should result in hotels in business cities being systemically underpriced compared to resort properties where more people will want to redeem.

Yes, it is very different than using ADR.
 

bobpark56

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
1,694
Reaction score
375
Points
444
Location
Gibsonia, PA (just north of Pittsburgh)
Resorts Owned
Westin Lagunamar, Westin Aventuras, Marriott Grande Vista, Sandos Caracol, Festiva, Diamond Resorts (Hawaii Collection)
Honestly, IMHO there are very few Vistana properties that are Marriott caliber. Not a big fan of Marriott right now because of MF. However, Vistana? Not much there outside of the Hawaii locations.

Vistana owners are getting a great deal if they can get into Marriott's system. Marriott owners are NOT getting a good deal by the integration of Vistana properties. Marriott should have sold the weeds off.
To each his own. We have 4 Westin/Starwood ownerships and one Marriott ownership. We stay in our Westin ownerships (Lagunamar & St John), we trade our Marriott ownership, usually into another Marriott. We have been doing this for more than 10 years and have yet to see a discernible difference in unit or resort quality. Indeed, we have yet to trade one of our Westin ownerships for a Marriott unit. So I beg to differ with your view of Westin/Vistana.
 

vacationtime1

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
5,159
Reaction score
2,750
Points
649
Location
San Francisco
Resorts Owned
WKORV-OF (Maui)
WKV x2 (Scottsdale)
To each his own. We have 4 Westin/Starwood ownerships and one Marriott ownership. We stay in our Westin ownerships (Lagunamar & St John), we trade our Marriott ownership, usually into another Marriott. We have been doing this for more than 10 years and have yet to see a discernible difference in unit or resort quality. Indeed, we have yet to trade one of our Westin ownerships for a Marriott unit. So I beg to differ with your view of Westin/Vistana.

+1

We own five Westins and two Marriotts. I see no overall difference in quality between the Westins we have stayed at (Ka'anapali, Kierland, Princeville, Lakeside Terrace (Vail), Nanea, Cancun) vs. the Marriotts we have visited (Newport Coast, Maui, Wailokoa, Waiohai, Kauai Beach Club, Timberlodge). We prefer the decor at the Westins, but that is not a deal point. For that matter, the two Hyatts we have visited (Tahoe and Carmel) are also of the same high caliber.

Some of the Sheratons on the east coast may be laggards, but based on the low number of destination points required to reserve them, the older Marriotts at Hilton Head and Orlando must also suffer by comparison.

Marriott is a good system, but it is not in a class by itself -- not even close.
 
Last edited:

Henry M.

TUG Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
2,454
Reaction score
669
Points
473
Location
Austin, TX
I also like the Westins. I traded with an owner at the Marriott Waiohai, and enjoyed it, but din't find it better than the Westin Princeville. The Poipu location is nice, but the property itself is just comparable, not better, for my taste. It is also the only place where I've ever had something stolen at the beach.

I own at WKORV and WKORVN, and enjoy those locations better than being on Ka'anapali Beach proper, due to the amount of people there. When I bought my first WKORV pre-construction, I considered Marriott, but at the time they only had the hotel conversion units which weren't even close to the Westin. I also like the reef in front of the Westin property. The new Marriott towers are a similar category, and so is the Hyatt. I considered a Hyatt unit, but didn't like the fixed week concept, with no lock-off. I can't always go on a fixed week. I also own at the Westin in St. John, and prefer that island over St. Thomas. I've been to Palm Springs and Kierland too, and really liked the properties there too. Lagunamar is a very nice property too. I have not visited any Orlando locations.

The only thing I like about the Marriott system is the couple of European locations, but I haven't exchanged into them yet. I like the Hyatt locations and properties, but the fixed weeks are an issue for me.

Overall, I think all three brands are pretty nice. I've staked my choice on Westins, but could see staying at the other brands. However, I don't see how Westin could be viewed as any lower quality than Marriott or Hyatt.

Lately, I've been renting my units and going the VRBO route when I want to go elsewhere. Maui ownership is easy to rent for more than the maintenance fees, and VRBO/HomeAway gives me many more options at locations that don't have timeshares, like many European cities. Maui is still my favorite place, though, with Westin locations at the top of my list.
 

GregT

TUG Member
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Messages
7,128
Reaction score
1,886
Points
599
Location
Carlsbad, CA
Resorts Owned
Marriott: Maui Ocean Club Lahaina Villas (3BRx5), Ko Olina, Shadow Ridge II, Willow Ridge, Aruba Ocean Club, DC Points HGVC: Flamingo, Sea World, I-Drive, Starwood Bella (x4), SDO, TradeWinds, Worldmark
All,

I think 4Sunsets is just jerking our chain. It’s an odd series of posts, I’m just happy with my Marriotts and my Vistanas (and my HGVCs)! All are good properties and happy to visit any of them.

Best,

Greg
 

4Sunsets

newbie
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
205
Reaction score
32
Points
28
All,

I think 4Sunsets is just jerking our chain. It’s an odd series of posts, I’m just happy with my Marriotts and my Vistanas (and my HGVCs)! All are good properties and happy to visit any of them.

Best,

Greg

Westin's haven't really impressed me or any in my family. That said, not a one of us is happy with Marriott at all since the merger. Especially the nonsense related to Suite Nights. It's so wonderful (sarcasm) to be LTP/LTT for a decade and now have to jump through hoops to get benefits we used to get w/o having to jump through hoops. Marriott ruined the whole system by basically making everyone platinum and then deciding that to get upgrades to suites we now have to once again stay XYZ number of nights a year. Not to mention all the other perks taken away. Most of my family (and everyone I know) is switching their loyalty to Hilton. Diamond status is $450 a year w tons of perks on the Aspire card and we don't have to jump through hoops and cast wishes to the heavens.
 

CalGalTraveler

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
9,745
Reaction score
8,272
Points
498
Location
California
Resorts Owned
HGVC, MVC Vistana
Westin's haven't really impressed me or any in my family. That said, not a one of us is happy with Marriott at all since the merger. Especially the nonsense related to Suite Nights. It's so wonderful (sarcasm) to be LTP/LTT for a decade and now have to jump through hoops to get benefits we used to get w/o having to jump through hoops. Marriott ruined the whole system by basically making everyone platinum and then deciding that to get upgrades to suites we now have to once again stay XYZ number of nights a year. Not to mention all the other perks taken away. Most of my family (and everyone I know) is switching their loyalty to Hilton. Diamond status is $450 a year w tons of perks on the Aspire card and we don't have to jump through hoops and cast wishes to the heavens.

It seems like Marriott is always finding ways to Bonvoy its customers. Although Hilton is not perfect, they seem to do a better job trying to keep their customers satisfied and are not always devaluing at every opportunity nor doing something on the condition that the customer must spend more money.

I have to call in a room award cancellation today and am nervous that all my points return to my Marriott account. Never have that concern with Hilton.
 

Ken555

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
14,522
Reaction score
5,638
Points
898
Location
Los Angeles
Resorts Owned
Westin Kierland
Sheraton Desert Oasis
It seems like Marriott is always finding ways to Bonvoy its customers. Although Hilton is not perfect, they seem to do a better job trying to keep their customers satisfied and are not always devaluing at every opportunity nor doing something on the condition that the customer must spend more money.

I have to call in a room award cancellation today and am nervous that all my points return to my Marriott account. Never have that concern with Hilton.

I’ve canceled and changed multiple Marriott reservations using points since the beginning of this year and it immediately credits correctly to my account, which is not what I could say about Starwood.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Ken555

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
14,522
Reaction score
5,638
Points
898
Location
Los Angeles
Resorts Owned
Westin Kierland
Sheraton Desert Oasis
Westin's haven't really impressed me or any in my family. That said, not a one of us is happy with Marriott at all since the merger. Especially the nonsense related to Suite Nights. It's so wonderful (sarcasm) to be LTP/LTT for a decade and now have to jump through hoops to get benefits we used to get w/o having to jump through hoops. Marriott ruined the whole system by basically making everyone platinum and then deciding that to get upgrades to suites we now have to once again stay XYZ number of nights a year. Not to mention all the other perks taken away. Most of my family (and everyone I know) is switching their loyalty to Hilton. Diamond status is $450 a year w tons of perks on the Aspire card and we don't have to jump through hoops and cast wishes to the heavens.

Are your complaints about the hotels (as your post seems to indicate now) or the timeshare resorts? Obviously, and as discussed ad nauseam, the system has been diluted.

I certainly can’t agree with you re the timeshares...Westin is consistently better than Marriott in almost every respect. As previously mentioned in another post, Marriott’s do not have consistent standards throughout all resorts which is not true with Westin. And, of course, there are feature differences, such as the studio/small 1-bed being full service with kitchen and laundry vs a hotel room with Marriott.

In any case, you should visit those resorts that appeal to you. Have fun!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Top