And Medicaid is not as available in many states as it is in some others....
Agreed ~I would not be surprised to see some insurance companies start refusing to pay for patients that are not vaccinated.
It is not so different with Medicare. The practice I have used for a couple of decades has been sold and resold, Drs changing every few years. Tried to get a new primary and haven't been able to. I see the reimbursement amounts from Medicare and understand why.Yes and no. I used to show a video of a mother trying to find a doctor who would take Medicaid for prenatal care. After somewhere around fifty phone calls, she gave up. I won't claim that this problem exists everywhere, but this was here experience in a California city.
...How well we do with regard to life expectancy compared with other first world nations when one looks at just our elderly population compares very favorably. On the other side of the life cycle, we do horribly with regard to newborns. As some say, "How can you not provide free prenatal care?" Not doing so, is one of the OTHER reasons that our numbers are so bad. Free prenatal care would actually save us a lot of medical expense.
I think some lack of follow up would be attributable to not wanting to lose a job by taking doc appt time out or transportation. Low income usually means issues in these areas. Pregnancy has A Lot of appointments. The lower you are on the job scale, the less time off and overall flexibility.Medicaid provides free prenatal care to low income. The vast majority of private practice OBs in our area took Medicaid for OB care. Unfortunately, many do not use it or are noncompliant with instructions, follow up, etc.
yep. also possible lack of OB in poorer neighborhoods, etc. Covid has certainly put the spotlight on disparities of community healthcare.I think some lack of follow up would be attributable to not wanting to lose a job by taking doc appt time out or transportation. Low income usually means issues in these areas. Pregnancy has A Lot of appointments. The lower you are on the job scale, the less time off and overall flexibility.
@CanuckTravlr Your link falls in line with my earlier comment. It shows life expectancy if you reach the age of 65 (when Medicare kicks in more or less). We (the US) do very well for our senior citizens, but not for our population as a whole. Here is a WHO report ranking nations with regard to health care.
We fall at 37th. (I don't know about more recently, but ten years ago, we would fall to something like 49th if it hadn't been for Medicare.)
If you don't trust WHO, here is a link that has a number of places that rank the top ten nations with regard to health care. The US did not make any of the lists.
Best Healthcare in the World 2024
worldpopulationreview.com
I wasn't making any reference to specific health care systems, but to your comments about life expectancy. In your previous post (#22) that I quoted, you made the statement that the USA compares very favourably with other first-world countries for life expectancy of its elderly population. The WHO study you have now quoted deals with 191 countries (almost the whole world), not just first-world countries. I certainly trust both the WHO and the OECD, but your most recent reference is to overall health care. I was solely referencing life expectancy of the elderly in the first-world.
The chart that I quoted in my post showed the USA towards the bottom of the list for average life expectancy of senior citizens in OECD (first-world) countries, not from birth, but from age 65, in other words the elderly population. I hope you are not trying to make the point that the USA fares well against all the countries in the world, including the poorest of those 191. If so, I'm not sure that counts for bragging rights, and it wasn't what you referred to in your prior post.
Without getting into a political discussion, Medicare simply puts the USA on a more apples-to-apples playing field vis à vis its senior citizens, since most other first-world nations also take good care of their senior citizens, including some form of universal health care. Yet the USA still falls towards the bottom end when compared to those other first-world nations. My initial disagreement and clarification was with your use of "very" favourably., since I believe the OECD report indicates otherwise.
To use a more specific example, when the USA is compared to Canada, which is near the top of the OECD list, the difference is almost 1.5 years or 7% longer remaining life expectancy for the average 65-year-old Canadian versus the average comparable American. Of course, those at the top of the socio-economic pyramid may have even better outcomes, but we are dealing with overall national outcomes. Maybe that is not a significant difference to you, but as a 72-year-old, I can assure I will be very happy to hopefully get the benefit of that extra time!!
There is a thread elsewhere about Delta's no-vaccination $200 surcharge and workers lining up to get vaccinated. THAT is the way to do it, incentivize getting the Covid19 vaccine by penalizing those who don't. The simple fact is, insurers and Medicare Advantage/Supplement plans paid out billions to treat those who got the virus before vaccines and those who refused vaccines once available. The $200 surcharge should be placed on all plans, because it is far cheaper to pay for 2 jabs than it is to intubate a person for 3-5 weeks. Do you smoke? Many plans lay on a surcharge because smokers usually die a long cancer-ridden and/or heart-disease death.
TS