• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 31 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 31st anniversary: Happy 31st Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $24,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $24 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    Tens of thousands of subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

New Properties Comment

jramat

TUG Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
Location
St. Louis Missouri
While attending owners update meeting here at Kierland, salesman said an announcement is coming in the fall about 3 new properties. I pushed for information but no cooperation. We'll see.
 
While attending owners update meeting here at Kierland, salesman said an announcement is coming in the fall about 3 new properties. I pushed for information but no cooperation. We'll see.

I wonder what the salesman would have said if you told him "I will consider buying when I know where the 3 new properties will be". I'm sure he'd have made something up in the spot - true or not.
 
Mars (dry), Venus (tropical), and Pluto (skiing)...
 
I can't see this being true. They are more focused on selling the new Flex Points program now. I can't see 3 new properties coming online concurrently. More or less wishful thinking.
 
While attending owners update meeting here at Kierland, salesman said an announcement is coming in the fall about 3 new properties. I pushed for information but no cooperation. We'll see.


Pure sales nonsense. Don't believe a word this guy told you, about anything, since this one comment discredits it all. Only believe what you have in writing and nothing - nothing - else from the SVN worse-than-used-car sales staff.


Sent from my iPad
 
Do we think SVN will ever (foreseeable-next 10 years) add new properties? It seems like a profitable model- you build condos worth $200k-$700k and sell them over 52 weeks for 3-4 times that and then lock in non competitive management contracts forever. It seems that as credit continues to be cheap that they would eventually add some. Am I missing something? I know they can repurchase resale inventory and resell- but it would seem new and shiny resorts would sell more and that having more profitable management contracts would only be a win for them.
 
Do we think SVN will ever (foreseeable-next 10 years) add new properties? It seems like a profitable model- you build condos worth $200k-$700k and sell them over 52 weeks for 3-4 times that and then lock in non competitive management contracts forever. It seems that as credit continues to be cheap that they would eventually add some. Am I missing something? I know they can repurchase resale inventory and resell- but it would seem new and shiny resorts would sell more and that having more profitable management contracts would only be a win for them.

As long as they have the ability (and uninformed owners and prospective owners willing) to churn accounts, no - that is, receive income from requalifying, overselling the current resorts with the new flex system, take back certain weeks and upsell.

Right now there is no incentive for them to develop at new locations.
 
As long as they have the ability (and uninformed owners and prospective owners willing) to churn accounts, no - that is, receive income from requalifying, overselling the current resorts with the new flex system, take back certain weeks and upsell.

Right now there is no incentive for them to develop at new locations.

It certainly appears you are correct. Starwood has no visible sign of building a shiny new destination property. I agree looking from the outside it seems it would be highly profitable. From their current inventory I have no interest in adding to what I own.
 
Most timeshare companies/groups are SALES oriented ... not builder/developer organization. And many would rather buy a finished product than build NEW - too long to delivery a final product, too much uncertainty, too expense for all the various types of financing, etc. Buying a finish product (like a bankrupt condo project) to sell has to have the right location & square footage - those are few & far between particularly as the economy improves.

Mergers have been popular of late - Wyndham buying Shell Vacation Club, for example.
 
what i got from talking with the sales people at SDO is that they do have something in the works. they are really not considering building from ground up what they are doing is taking already existing starwood hotel properties and converting several floors to timeshare. this i believe to be true. they understand they need more sites and this is a much more economical way to have more sites.
 
I've seen this tactic in other sales presentations and could not find the word for it. I looked this up back then and thought I'd share it now.


From English Grammar & Usage:

"dissimulate (or dissemble); alternatives include prevaricate (avoid a direct answer) equivocate (give an ambiguous answer: "you will emerge from the war with the Romans victorious"), and obfuscate (give a confusing answer that serves to hide the real information), but all of those require you to say something. Only dissimulate implies you say nothing at all: a lie of omission (cf. lie of commission).

On a different tack, there is both non-disclosure and maintaining confidentiality, which both mean to purposefully withhold information, but usually the intent is to protect one's own interests, rather than mislead.

To keep mum (and synonyms) is similar, except that's typically applied to someone who has transgressed (or knows about someone who has) in some way.
"
 
Last edited:
Top