sjsharkie
TUG Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
- Messages
- 2,321
- Reaction score
- 441
- Points
- 293
For WLR, I definitely seeing you being able to get what you want via SVN. The challenge is that it is much more costly than what II can provide you with an SDO trade (if the trade is available). If you understand the system and cost, I wouldn't hesitate to buy mandatory -- that being said the rules can change at any time (as you well know, since I see you around the Marriott board).I think this is what is scaring us away from mandatory. Sure, making single night reservations at 8 months out appeals to some. My issue is that we prefer to travel for 7 or more nights. My fear is that single night reservations will make is harder to book 7 or more nights. Those single night reservations will break full weeks. These changes tend to hurt the small time single week owners while making things better for people with lots of SOs.
I actually don't think you will see a ton of change for WLR. I think there will be little impact for WLR, SVV, SVR and SDO since I don't see many people trading into prime season via SVN. I do see larger impact for areas like Hawaii.II see lots of sightings for WLR. Though perhaps that will go down over time as the resort sells out. I could still always buy at WLR, though the MFs are close to $1500 it looks like, not sure we would want to pay that much for a week there since I think we could rent directly from Starwood for close to that price.
Honestly, I hang out more in the Marriott forum now since there just seems to be a ton more activity there. I am hoping that the renegotiation of the II contract may roll out some rules in II's favor, but I am likely in the minority that any change would go in their favor. Marriott renegotiated theirs as well this year and I worry that they could head down the same road as SVO as far as rule changes go.
-ryan