It's completely understandable that people would be (and perhaps should be) instinctively dubious about the validity of free or $1 timeshare offerings.
After all, the developers are selling the same product to the uninformed and unsuspecting for tens of thousands of dollars --- every single day.
Potential timeshare acquirers often can (and often do) simply and conveniently overlook the fact that the
real cost of timeshare ownership (...obscenely overpriced developer-direct purchases completely aside) actually lies in the annual (and essentially eternal) maintenance fee obligations ---
not in the initial acquisition cost.
The mantra that "maintenance fees are forever" is always worth remembering and repeating. In essence, there ain't no "free", so any and every timeshare acquisition should fit the needs of the new "grantee-to-be", whether that grantee-to-be's objective is actual usage, exchanging, becoming a landlord, or some combination thereof.
"Free timeshare" offerings aren't necessarily (or very often) a "scam", but instead merely someone who has decided and is now openly proclaiming
No Mas to the ongoing, now unwelcome annual maintenance fee obligations for something which they no longer need, use, enjoy or want to continue to deal with any longer.