Her open blouse for the interview says a lot.....
Agreed. It's obvious she deliberately invites the attention. The part I am not sure of is, while she did say she was embarrassed, she also said, if I understood her correctly, that she was not the one claiming sexual harrassment. I am not saying that what the guys did was ok, but if she honestly was not bothered by it beyond being a bit embarrassed, therefore was not, in her eyes "sexually harrassed", then why are others assigning that to her? Could this simply be a difference in cultures? It's a fine line to be sure. As a woman I take on different roles. As a mother I would never go out with my kids and my stuff hanging out, or in tight clothes. And I can't stand it when a man stands and ogles, especially if he has his wife with him.
However, when I am out on a date with my husband, I want to look good. Sexy. And I am not above showing some cleavage, or wearing snug fitting bottoms and sexy heels. Not slutty, there is a difference. But elegant in a sexy way, or sexy in an elegant way. And my husband appreciates it. He is a guy after all. If another man checks me out when I look dress that way I don't give him the hairy eyeball look. There is a difference between
admiring and
ogling. If a woman goes in a male locker room, some place I feel she has no place being, especially dressed the way she was, you can't expect the guys to act like monks. If a buff, shirtless man walked in a locker room with a bunch of ladies, I bet he'd get cat called too. I know I'd whistle!