• The TUGBBS forums are completely free and open to the public and exist as the absolute best place for owners to get help and advice about their timeshares for more than 30 years!

    Join Tens of Thousands of other Owners just like you here to get any and all Timeshare questions answered 24 hours a day!
  • TUG started 30 years ago in October 1993 as a group of regular Timeshare owners just like you!

    Read about our 30th anniversary: Happy 30th Birthday TUG!
  • TUG has a YouTube Channel to produce weekly short informative videos on popular Timeshare topics!

    Free memberships for every 50 subscribers!

    Visit TUG on Youtube!
  • TUG has now saved timeshare owners more than $21,000,000 dollars just by finding us in time to rescind a new Timeshare purchase! A truly incredible milestone!

    Read more here: TUG saves owners more than $21 Million dollars
  • Sign up to get the TUG Newsletter for free!

    60,000+ subscribing owners! A weekly recap of the best Timeshare resort reviews and the most popular topics discussed by owners!
  • Our official "end my sales presentation early" T-shirts are available again! Also come with the option for a free membership extension with purchase to offset the cost!

    All T-shirt options here!
  • A few of the most common links here on the forums for newbies and guests!

What is a fair resolution?

MOXJO7282

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
1,312
Points
599
I'd like some feedback on what people think is a fair resolution to a TS resale deal that has gone bad.

Buyer purchases an EOY 2018 high demand unit with a holiday week usage in 2018 already established in a reservation and contracted to be given to the buyer as part of the deal.

Buyer confirms reservation is valid and properly written in the contract and honors their end of the deal 100%.

As it turns out seller on May 1st converted the reservation to DC points so now that week is gone and cannot be retrieved nor can a similar week be provided because of super high demand.

Buyer cannot rent that week on renter's market for less than $4k if not more.

Seller has proposed offering $2300 cash or another week in place of the high demand week but in comparison it will be a low demand week the buyer can't use or rent for anything near the $4k needed to rent the high demand week they wanted nor give them the option to rent the week and receive the proceeds.

Buyer feels they shouldn't lose any value since they did nothing wrong and since seller made the egregious mistake they need to compensate the buyer fully and make them whole.

The buyer has proposed a $4k cash payment or refund of the full transaction and return of the week because otherwise they bought a week in 2017 they can't use until 2020 which to them is totally unacceptable unless the $4k is paid because they face 2018 and 2019 MFs before usage is available again.

This also involves a reputable broker so it will be interesting to see how they look to make this right.

So should the buyer accept anything less than the reservation in question or the FMV of the week which can be easily confirmed by Redweek?
 

scootr5

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
3,610
Reaction score
813
Points
349
Location
Second City
Resorts Owned
Marriott Grande Vista, Wyndham (points and Avenue Plaza Mardi Gras week)
I would say the seller should negotiate the best deal they can on the open market to secure you the week they contracted to provide. If they can get it for less than $4000, good for them.

On the flip side, how important is the having the ongoing usage of that high demand week worth to you? If you walk away from this deal over a difference of $1000-$1300, will it be easy to acquire a similar week in the future at a similar price?
 

WalnutBaron

TUG Review Crew: Expert
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2008
Messages
2,193
Reaction score
2,585
Points
574
Location
California
Resorts Owned
Hyatt Highlands Inn, Hyatt Pinon Pointe
I have a similar reaction to Scott's. While I understand that the high demand week was part of your calculation in securing the resale purchase of the timeshare interval in question, I'm wondering how important it is to you to have and enjoy the same interval for many years in the future. Since this is a high season unit, I'd try to negotiate the best compensation package I can with the seller--using the expertise of the reputable broker as my guide--without pushing so hard that I lose the deal.

On the other hand, if this is a points purchase with floating usage within high season and you feel the arbitrage for the potential rental value has come and gone, you have every right to scotch the deal since you're not getting what was originally offered.
 

DeniseM

Moderator
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
57,763
Reaction score
9,164
Points
1,849
Resorts Owned
WKORV, WKV, 2-SDO, 4-Kauai Beach Villas, Island Park Village (Yellowstone), Hyatt High Sierra, Dolphin's Cove (Anaheim)
As it turns out seller on May 1st converted the reservation to DC points so now that week is gone and cannot be retrieved nor can a similar week be provided because of super high demand.
Unless this is a rare deal, that you will never find again, I would walk away because of the principle involved - the seller tried to defraud you.
 

bizaro86

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
3,682
Reaction score
2,507
Points
598
Location
Calgary, AB, Canada
Unless this is a fixed holiday week or something that you're getting a great deal on, I would walk away unless I received the full $4k in value, or a replacement week. The seller can't deliver what was in the contract, so they have no way of insisting that you go through with it, imo.
 

Quadmaniac

TUG Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
1,913
Reaction score
217
Points
273
Location
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Resorts Owned
Marriott Willow Ridge (x2), Ko Olina week 51 (x3) & 52(x2)
My brother went through this EXACT situation when he was buying his holiday fixed week. In the end, the seller had to rent for my brother a week off Redweek during that holiday week. It wasn't my brother's fault. It took alot of going back and forth with the broker as they tried to get around it, but in the end they had to pony up on their mistake.

In another case, they reduced the price by $3K as they used the week. Both times, had to chase the broker, but it got done.
 

vacationtime1

TUG Review Crew: Veteran
TUG Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
5,180
Reaction score
2,783
Points
649
Location
San Francisco
Resorts Owned
WKORV-OF (Maui)
WKV x2 (Scottsdale)
I would walk away from the deal, rent the week you want on the open market for $4K, and wait two years before looking to buy a replacement unit. Giving the time value of money and the fact that prices are more likely to go down rather than up in the next two years, you will probably come out ahead.

If it makes you feel better, the broker is going to fire her client because there is nothing for the broker to sell (no usage until 2020) and the seller lost the opportunity to sell the unit because no one is going to buy it at this point (no usage until 2020).
 

MOXJO7282

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
1,312
Points
599
A prime resale unit at a good price with the prime week already reserved with it is a very rare circumstance when procuring a resale week and it made the deal go from good to great in the buyer's mind and is the only reason they considered the unit. They would've passed on the deal as it is being offered now as there are many good deals out there but not many great deals.

I'll let everyone know of the outcome.
 

MOXJO7282

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
1,312
Points
599
My brother went through this EXACT situation when he was buying his holiday fixed week. In the end, the seller had to rent for my brother a week off Redweek during that holiday week. It wasn't my brother's fault. It took alot of going back and forth with the broker as they tried to get around it, but in the end they had to pony up on their mistake.

In another case, they reduced the price by $3K as they used the week. Both times, had to chase the broker, but it got done.
This is the buyer's expectation that they receive the week they contracted for or equal value. The problem is Redweek right now only shows $4900 for several units available but that validates the buyer's position that the week's value is min $4k but likely more. The latest offer is $3k cash from the seller but buyer has countered and is waiting for a response to the counter.
 

MOXJO7282

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
1,312
Points
599
Final agreement is a $3200 cash settlement. Buyer feels they lost min $800-$1200 from the rework but still felt the unit was worth it. The unit is a Maui Ocean Club 2BD/3BTH OF even year and the original resale price was $11k plus 2018 MFs minus the $3200 still a very good deal worth keeping but the extra value lost would've made it a great deal.
 

DeniseM

Moderator
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
57,763
Reaction score
9,164
Points
1,849
Resorts Owned
WKORV, WKV, 2-SDO, 4-Kauai Beach Villas, Island Park Village (Yellowstone), Hyatt High Sierra, Dolphin's Cove (Anaheim)
What explanation did they give for converting the week that was promised to you to DC points?
 

MOXJO7282

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
1,312
Points
599
They suggested it was just an honest mistake and stated they felt Marriott made a mistake by letting them cancel the original February 17-24 reservation almost a week after the April 27 closing date.

That is not taking responsibility for their egregious error but I wanted to be done with the deal and didn't really want to get into it.
 

DeniseM

Moderator
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
57,763
Reaction score
9,164
Points
1,849
Resorts Owned
WKORV, WKV, 2-SDO, 4-Kauai Beach Villas, Island Park Village (Yellowstone), Hyatt High Sierra, Dolphin's Cove (Anaheim)
I had the same thing happen to me once, so I feel your aggravation! ;)
 

WackyLucy

Guest
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
137
Reaction score
108
Points
103
Location
Massachusetts
This is the buyer's expectation that they receive the week they contracted for or equal value. The problem is Redweek right now only shows $4900 for several units available but that validates the buyer's position that the week's value is min $4k but likely more.

I understand and agree, but am not sure that (perhaps optimistic) asking prices for listed rentals on RedWeek is a rock solid value benchmark.

If the buyer is satisfied with the end result I guess that's all that ultimately matters, despite the fact that the seller inexcusably attempted to deny any personal responsibility or accountability for what appears to have been a very clear breach of contract on their part. Invoking Marriott's name as somehow sharing any seller responsibility or blame was also quite juvenile, imo. All good in the end though I guess, if everyone is satisfied.
 
Last edited:

MOXJO7282

Tug Review Crew
TUG Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
1,312
Points
599
Well an even better ending to the story much to my surprise. As i mentioned this was with a broker I knew to be very reputable so I was hoping he would step up and I happy to say he did. He has agreed to add $1000 to the $3200 the seller is offering so the buyer is getting $4200 to replace the Pres week that was to be part of the contract to truly make the buyer whole and happy.
 
Top