Redweek doesn't do any research on the info for the Ads - they only use what the owner provides. Garbage in = garbage out.
Agreed. I learned last week that even some so-called "RedWeek verified" ads actually have incomplete and / or inaccurate information.
I looked at a Maine resale timeshare ad in which the unit number was identified, but not the building number. Having stayed at that place previously, I know that this same "unit number" actually exists in each one of (3) separate buildings at that property. Why does it matter? I know (even if RedWeek didn't bother to learn) that different buildings there have differently defined weeks (either Friday to Friday or Sat-Sat, depending on the building); the distinction clearly matters for travel planning. Initial inquiry to RedWeek for clarification on the missing information yielded the reply "that's what the owner provided to us". O.K., but that reply begs the question --- what exactly is it that RedWeek is "verifying"? This is also a "full service" listing, btw.
In another instance involving a place where we own an interval, RedWeek listing (again allegedly "RedWeek verified") indicates "pool view" for a floating week ownership. Well, floating week reservations get assigned whatever is actually available at the time and at least nine out of thirty unit possibilities do
not have a pool view. So once again, what exactly got "RedWeek verified"? This is a "full service" listing, as well as being "RedWeek verified" and the misleading information still remains posted today, a week plus after RedWeek was informed of that listing misrepresentation.
Seems to me that RedWeek might be "verifying" ownership legitimacy, but perhaps not bothering to "verify" much else?